arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBLES -v- HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • ROBLES -v- HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • ROBLES -v- HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
  • ROBLES -v- HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED et al Print Wrongful Termination Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Elyza P. Heraldez, Esq. (State Bar No. 293395) ELECTRONICALLY FILED HERALDEZ LAW PC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 7349 Milliken Avenue, Ste. 1404 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT Office: (909) 942-9992 Email: Elyza.Heraldez@Heraldezlaw.com 12/4/2023 4:07 PM By: Jasmine Bolanos, DEPUTY Attorneys for Plaintiff, YESENIA ROBLES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 11 YESENIA ROBLES, CASE NO.: CIVSB2314929 12 Plaintiff, [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Khymberli Apaloo, Dpt. $25] 13 vs. SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF 14 HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED, a California MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL Corporation, HIMNEL USA INCORPORATED FURTHER RESPONSES TO EMPLOYMENT 15 DBA ST. MARY’S MONTESSORI SCHOOL, a FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND California Corporation, and DOES 1-20, REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF 16 Inclusive, DOCUMENTS, SET ONE 17 Defendants. [Filed concurrently with Notice of Motion and Motion Compel Further Responses t0 to 18 Employment Form Interrogatories, Set One and Request For Production Of Documents, Set One; 19 Declaration of Elyza P. Heraldez; and [proposed] Order on Motion to Compel Further Discovery 20 Responses] 21 Hearing Date: February 14, 2024 Time: 8:30 a.m. 22 Location: Department $28 23 Complaint filed: July 5, 2023 24 Discovery Cutoff: None Set Trail Date: None Set 25 26 27 28 1 SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO EMPLOYMENT FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1345, Plaintiff Yesenia Robles submits this Separate Statement of Discovery Items in Dispute in support of Plaintiff’ s Motion t0 Compel Further Discovery Responses t0 Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Production 0f Documents, Set One. DISCOVERY ITEMS IN DISPUTE EMPLOYMENT FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET 1 Interrogatorv N0. 206.3 State the name and ADDRESS of the recipient and the substance 0f each post TERMINATION statement PUBLISHED about EMPLOYEE by any agent or employee of EMPLOYER. Response t0 Interrogatorv No. 206.3 10 Identities and contact information of parents, guardians, and students 0f the school is confidential 11 information which can only be produced subject to a stipulated protective order. 12 Reason t0 Compel Further Response to Interrogatorv N0. 206.3 13 Responding Pary’s refusal to respond to this Interrogatory absent a protective order is improper. 14 Each interrogatory response must be as complete as the information available allows. Where the 15 interrogatory is clear, an evasive response is improper. (Cal. CiV. Proc. Code § 2030.220(a), (b); Deyo v. 16 Kilboume (1978) 84 Cal. App. 3d 771, 783.) 17 Further, Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010 specifically allows for the discovery 0f the 18 identity and location 0f potential Witnesses. (Code CiV. Proc., § 2017.010; see also Williams v. Superior 19 Court (2017) 3 Ca1.5th 531, 552 [compelling disclosure 0f contact information of potentially thousands 20 0f employees, reasoning that “contact information is reasonably understood as a legitimate ‘starting point 21 for further investigations’ through Which a plaintiff may ‘educate [himself 0r herself] concerning [the 22 parties’] claims and defenses.” (Citing Puerto v. Superior Court (2009) 158 Ca1.App.4th 1242, 1250, 23 1249); People v. Dixon (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 414, 443 [“disclosure 0f the names and addresses 0f 24 potential witnesses is a routine and essential part 0f pretrial discovery”].) 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO EMPLOYMENT FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE