arrow left
arrow right
  • Marcus Abrams, Clearwater Ventures, Inc., Lisa Abrams, Lisa Abrams in her capacity as Trustee for the Lisa Marie Abrams Revocable Trust v. Russell Abrams, Russellcar Inversora, S.A., Crosstax, S.A., Taxcorp, S.A., Carcorp, S.A., Russellcar S.R.L., Aracar Group Holdings Corp., Aracar Financiera, S.A., Aracar Servicios, S.A., Aracar Group Spv I Llc, Aracar Group Spv Ii LlcSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 75 (Arbitration) - Commercial Division document preview
  • Marcus Abrams, Clearwater Ventures, Inc., Lisa Abrams, Lisa Abrams in her capacity as Trustee for the Lisa Marie Abrams Revocable Trust v. Russell Abrams, Russellcar Inversora, S.A., Crosstax, S.A., Taxcorp, S.A., Carcorp, S.A., Russellcar S.R.L., Aracar Group Holdings Corp., Aracar Financiera, S.A., Aracar Servicios, S.A., Aracar Group Spv I Llc, Aracar Group Spv Ii LlcSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 75 (Arbitration) - Commercial Division document preview
  • Marcus Abrams, Clearwater Ventures, Inc., Lisa Abrams, Lisa Abrams in her capacity as Trustee for the Lisa Marie Abrams Revocable Trust v. Russell Abrams, Russellcar Inversora, S.A., Crosstax, S.A., Taxcorp, S.A., Carcorp, S.A., Russellcar S.R.L., Aracar Group Holdings Corp., Aracar Financiera, S.A., Aracar Servicios, S.A., Aracar Group Spv I Llc, Aracar Group Spv Ii LlcSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 75 (Arbitration) - Commercial Division document preview
  • Marcus Abrams, Clearwater Ventures, Inc., Lisa Abrams, Lisa Abrams in her capacity as Trustee for the Lisa Marie Abrams Revocable Trust v. Russell Abrams, Russellcar Inversora, S.A., Crosstax, S.A., Taxcorp, S.A., Carcorp, S.A., Russellcar S.R.L., Aracar Group Holdings Corp., Aracar Financiera, S.A., Aracar Servicios, S.A., Aracar Group Spv I Llc, Aracar Group Spv Ii LlcSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 75 (Arbitration) - Commercial Division document preview
  • Marcus Abrams, Clearwater Ventures, Inc., Lisa Abrams, Lisa Abrams in her capacity as Trustee for the Lisa Marie Abrams Revocable Trust v. Russell Abrams, Russellcar Inversora, S.A., Crosstax, S.A., Taxcorp, S.A., Carcorp, S.A., Russellcar S.R.L., Aracar Group Holdings Corp., Aracar Financiera, S.A., Aracar Servicios, S.A., Aracar Group Spv I Llc, Aracar Group Spv Ii LlcSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 75 (Arbitration) - Commercial Division document preview
  • Marcus Abrams, Clearwater Ventures, Inc., Lisa Abrams, Lisa Abrams in her capacity as Trustee for the Lisa Marie Abrams Revocable Trust v. Russell Abrams, Russellcar Inversora, S.A., Crosstax, S.A., Taxcorp, S.A., Carcorp, S.A., Russellcar S.R.L., Aracar Group Holdings Corp., Aracar Financiera, S.A., Aracar Servicios, S.A., Aracar Group Spv I Llc, Aracar Group Spv Ii LlcSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 75 (Arbitration) - Commercial Division document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 09:30 PM INDEX NO. 654992/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MARCUS ABRAMS, CLEARWATER VENTURES, INC. and LISA ABRAMS, individually and in her Capacity as Trustee for the LISA MARIE ABRAMS REVOCABLE TRUST, Index No. 654992/2022 Petitioners, Hon. Joel M. Cohen -against- Motion Seq. No.: 001 RUSSELL ABRAMS, RUSSELLCAR INVERSORA S.A., CROSSTAX, S.A., TAXCORP, S.A., CARCORP, S.A., ARACAR GROUP HOLDINGS CORP., ARACAR FINANCIERA, S.A., ARACAR SERVICIOS, S.A., ARACAR GROUP SPV I LLC, and ARACAR GROUP SPV II LLC, Respondents. ATTORNEY AFFIRMATION JAMES R. SERRITELLA, an attorney duly licensed to practice law, affirms as follows: 1. I am a member of Kim & Serritella LLP, counsel for Petitioners in this matter. As such I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances set forth herein. 2. This affirmation is submitted in support of this proceeding to confirm Petitioner’s arbitration award (the “Award”) against Respondents Russell Abrams (“Russell”), Russellcar Inversora S.A., Crosstax, S.A., Taxcorp, S.A., Carcorp, S.A. (collectively “Russellcar”), Aracar Group Holdings Corp., Aracar Financiera, S.A., Aracar Servicios, S.A., Aracar Group SPV I LLC, and Aracar Group SPV II LLC (collectively “Aracar”), and in opposition to Respondents’ motion to vacate or modify the Award. 1 of 3 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 09:30 PM INDEX NO. 654992/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 3. Petitioners, Respondents, and certain other persons and entities were parties to an AAA arbitration proceeding (the “Arbitration”) concerning a loan Petitioners made with Respondents. 4. Respondents were represented by three successive law firms in the Arbitration, all of whom represented Aracar for at least some portion of the proceedings. 5. A week before the Arbitration hearing was to begin, Sandra Abrams (née Piedrabuena), Russell’s wife and one of the respondents in the Arbitration, brought a Hail Mary order to show cause to stay the Arbitration on the grounds that she was not a proper party. Her application was dismissed. Despite making similar arguments on similar facts, Aracar did not join in her application. 6. Eventually the matter proceeded to a hearing. A copy of the expert report of Matthew Kennedy, the Arbitration respondents’ damages expert, that was submitted at the hearing is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1. 7. Petitioners prepared a calculation of damages based on some financial information included in Kennedy’s report that was submitted as an appendix to their post-hearing brief. For clarity, a copy of Petitioner’s calculation of damages thus submitted is annexed hereto as Exhibit 2. It can also be found as Appendix B to Petitioner’s post-hearing brief, which is filed on the docket as Respondent’s Ex. EE. 8. A copy of the Award (previously submitted as an exhibit to the petition in this matter) is annexed hereto as Exhibit 3. The Award contains 3 categories of damages: 1) Russell’s liability for a personal guarantee he made (the “Guarantee Damages”); 2) Russellcar and Aracar’s joint and several liability for breach of contract (the “Breach Damages”); and 3) 2 of 3 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2023 09:30 PM INDEX NO. 654992/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2023 Russell, Russellcar, and Aracar’s joint and several liability for fees associated with the Arbitration (the “Fees”). 9. In their petition to confirm the Award, Petitioners requested the total of the Guarantee Damages, the Breach Damages, and the Fees, as that was how the damages were presented in the Award. However, sometime after the petition was filed, the arbitrator wrote the parties to clarify that the Breach Damages were only for any amount not paid by Russell as part of the Guarantee Damages. In any case, it appears that all Respondents remain jointly and severally liable for the Fees regardless of any amounts that may be paid towards the Breach Damages or Guarantee Damages. Dated: New York, New York March 10, 2023 /s/ James R. Serritella James R. Serritella 3 of 3