On March 15, 2022 a Motion-Secondary was filed involving a dispute between Arntsen Family Partnership, Lp, Arntsen, Robert, Brian Christopher Dunn Custodianship, Ho, John, Huang, Quanyu, Lee, Mary, and Black Horse Holdings, Llc, Bragg, David M, Caproc Iii, Llc, Davis, Gregory J, Huang, Quanyu, Huish, Dale, Justesen, Jason, Kludt, Kurtis Stuart, Mclan Trust, Monks Family Trust, Oneil, Scott, Paramont Capital, Llc, Paramont Woodside, Llc, Silicon Valley Real Ventures, Llc, Stoker, Diane, Stoker, Phil, Svrv 385 Moore, Llc, Svrv 387 Moore, Llc, Teh Capital, Llc, Wild Rose Irrevocable Trust, Wolfe, Kevin, Wz Partners Llc, for (16) Unlimited Fraud in the District Court of San Mateo County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
Ryan van Steenis (SBN 254542) 1 1601 S Shepherd Dr., #276 2 Houston, Texas 77019 314-749-2284 3 rjvansteenis@gmail.com 4 Attorney for Defendants Dave Bragg, and 5 Silicon Valley Real Ventures, LLC 6 3/9/2023 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 10 11 Robert Arntsen; Mary Lee; Arntsen Family ) Case No.: 22-CIV-01148 Partnership, LP; and Brian Christopher Dunn ) 12 Custodianship, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ) DEFENDANTS DAVID BRAGG AND 13 Plaintiffs, ) SILICON VALLEY REAL VENTURES ) REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME 14 vs. ) TO RESPOND OR ANSWER ) 15 David M. Bragg; Kurtis Stuart Kludt; Silicon ) [Filed in conjunction with Defendants Bragg and Valley Real Ventures LLC; SVRV 385 Moore, ) SVRV’s Opposition to Request for Entry of 16 LLC; SVRV 387 Moore, LLC; Gregory J. Davis; ) Default and Request for Extension of Time to Kevin Wolfe; Jason Justesen; Paramont ) Answer or Otherwise Respond] 17 Woodside, LLC; and Paramont Capital, LLC; ) ) Judge: Hon. Robert D. Foiles 18 ) Dept: 21 ) Action Filed: March 15, 2022 19 Defendants. Trial Date: Unassigned 20 21 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ February 28, 2023, request for entry of default 22 against Defendants’ Bragg and SVRV, Bragg and SVRV’s opposition to Plaintiffs’ request, and 23 having considered the arguments made therein finds that good cause exists to DENY Plaintiffs’ 24 request and GRANT Defendants’ request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ operative 25 pleadings (the first amended complaint). Defendants Bragg and SVRV are hereby ordered to answer 26 or otherwise respond the first amended complaint on or before March 24, 2023. 27 28 -1- [Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: ___________________ ______________________________ Hon. Robert D. Foiles 4 Judge of the Superior Court 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request PROOF OF SERVICE 1 I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. I hereby certify that on March 8, 2023, 2 I served the following document(s) on the parties in the above-entitled action: 3 DAVID BRAGG AND SILICON VALLEY REAL VENTURES LLC’S [PROPOSED] 4 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND 5 A REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND OR ANSWER 6 Via Email: I emailed the document(s) referenced above to the following persons at the following 7 email addresses: 8 Robert Dunn rdunn@eimerstahl.com 9 Collin Vierra 10 cvierra@eimerstahl.com Counsel for Plaintiffs 11 Jessica Chong 12 jchong@spencerfane.com 13 Brian Zimmerman bzimmerman@spencerfane.com 14 Counsel for Defendants Gregory J. Davis, Kevin Wolfe, Jason Justesen, Paramont Woodside, LLC, Paramont Capital, LLC, SVRV 385 Moore, LLC, and SVRV 387 Moore, 15 LLC 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is a 17 true and correct statement. 18 Dated: March 8, 2023 19 Ryan van Steenis Attorney for Defendant Bragg and 20 Silicon Valley Real Ventures, LLC 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- [Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request