arrow left
arrow right
  • RICARDO GOMEZ -V- CITY OF RIALTO POLICE Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • RICARDO GOMEZ -V- CITY OF RIALTO POLICE Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • RICARDO GOMEZ -V- CITY OF RIALTO POLICE Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • RICARDO GOMEZ -V- CITY OF RIALTO POLICE Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

To: 19097088586©rcfax.com Fax: (909) 708-8586 Page: 93 of 174 04104I2022 7:50 AM From: Leah Stein Fax: 13106239033 \a \a Michael Karns, Esq. (SIBN 232256) F I L E D William Karns, Esq, (SIBN 238599) SUPERIOR COURT 0F CAUFORNIA COUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO Timothy P. Mitchell, Esq. (SBN 234] 30) SAN BERNARDINO Dusmncr Karns & Kams, LLP 800 West 6‘“ Street, Suite 800 APR O 4 2022 Los Angeles, CA 900] 7 \OOOQQ‘J‘I-hbJNi—d Tel: (310) 623—9032 Fax: (3 10) 623-9033 By a l% gin“) ANGE E ARCIA,Daputy Email: tim@kamsandkams.com Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RICARDO GOMEZ, an Individual; Case No; CIVDSZOO9827 Assigned t0 Hon. Thomas Garza Plaintiff, DEPT: $27 VS. PLA I'NTIFF’S OBJECTIONS T0 THE DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF CITY OF RIALTO POLICE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DEPARTMENT, a Government Entity; CITY SUMMARY JUDGMENT A3 OF RIALTO, a Government entity; [Filed Concurrently With Opposition t0 NICHOLAS ADAM BESH'E‘ER, an Motion For Summary Judgment; Declaration Individual; and DOES through150, Inclusive; Of Ricardo Gomez; Of Timothy P. Declaration x25 Mitchel]; [Proposed] Order On Objections T0 Defendants NNNNNNNNN—r—dv—am—d—‘H—HH Declaration In Support Of Defendants Motion; Response To Separate Statement; Plaintiff’s mfl¢mbwwfloomflomgwwflo Separate Statement] Hearing In formation: Date: April 19, 2022 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: 827 Complaint Filed: May 20, 2020 Tn‘al Date: May 23, 2022 Plaintiff hereby submits the following evidentiary objections to the Declaration of NICHOLAS BESHEER, filed in support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 047‘?) 06c (”I /“/>, ‘/ M9 ‘gfid’oo C/ ’ L/LO Vkw 6r 6’6, \/ tin. A Q/(m “a. 7/ 5, $30?»c> {4% I ‘,.. 7%. \Vq M Gad, '3 (P) n 1‘ Rs??? 63% v V V