Document for Wells Fargo Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. 16th Street Regency, Llc, Nathan Hirsch A/K/A NATHAN HIRCH, Benjamin Mutzen, Wells Fargo National Bank, National Association SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA BANK, National Association, City Of New York By Environmental Control Board, City Of New York By Parking Violations Bureau, City Of New York By Transit Adjudication Bureau, Ace Installers DBA ACCURATE CUSTOM ENTRANCES, Builders Assistance Corp., Board Of Managers Of 198-210 16th Street Condominium, William Mcnutt, Jessica Akami, Negar Akami

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                At an I.A.S. Term, part ____________ of
                                                             the Supreme Court of the County of Kings
                                                             held in the Kings Supreme Court in the city
                                                             of Brooklyn, New York on the __________
                                                             day of _______________, 20________.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
----------------------------------------------------------------X
 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL                                       ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
 ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER
 TO WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL
 ASSOCIATION

                         Plaintiff,
 vs
                                                                    INDEX #: 10493/2010
 16TH STREET REGENCY LLC, NATHAN
 HIRSCH AKA NATHAN HIRSH, BENJAMIN                                  MORTGAGED PREMISES:
 MUTZEN, WELLS FARGO NATIONAL                                       200 16th Street, Unit 1B
 BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,                                        Brooklyn, NY 11215
 SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WACHOVIA
 BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CITY OF
 NEW YORK BY ENVIRONMENTAL
 CONTROL BOARD, CITY OF NEW YORK
 BY PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU, CITY
 OF NEW YORK BY TRANSIT
 ADJUDICATION BUREAU, ACE
 INSTALLERS, DBA ACCURATE CUSTOM
 ENTRANCES, BUILDERS ASSISTANCE
 CORP., BOARD OF MANAGERS OF 198-210
 16TH STREET CONDOMINIUM, WILLIAM
 MCNUTT, JESSICA AKAMI, NEGAR AKAMI


                       Defendant(s).
----------------------------------------------------------------X


        Upon reading and filing the affirmation of Alexandra R. Heaney, Esq. sworn to on

August 7, 2023, and upon the exhibits attached thereto.

        Let the Defendant (“16th Street Regency LLC”) show cause before a motion term of this

Court, to be held at the Courthouse located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 on the
_________day of __________________, at _____________ or as soon thereafter as counsel may

be heard for an Order:

       i)         Denying the Defendant’s cross-motion for failure to obtain jurisdiction over

                  Plaintiff;

       ii)        Pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) vacating the Plaintiff’s default in appearing at the

                  July 31, 2023 Conference and vacating Plaintiff’s default in opposing the

                  Defendant’s motion for lack of proper service on Plaintiff;

       iii)       Pursuant to CPLR 2004 for an extension of time for Plaintiff to submit opposition

                  to Defendant’s cross-motion 60 days from a final determination of this motion;

       iv)        Restoring Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale to the Active

                  calendar; and

       v)         For Such other and further relief as this Court may deem equitable, just, and

                  proper.



       ORDERED: that pursuant to CPLR 2004, Plaintiff’s time to submit opposition to

Defendant’s cross-motion is hereby extended 60 days from a final determination of this Motion;

and Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale is restored to the Active calendar.

       Sufficient cause appearing therefor, let service of this Order and all supporting

documents upon all parties to this action as follows: on Defendant via Electron Service via

NYSCEF on or before ____________________________________________, be deemed good

and sufficient.

       That Defendant shall file its opposition by: _______________________, and Plaintiff

shall file its Reply by:______________________________.
      An affidavit or other proof of service shall be presented to this Court on or before

_________________________________________.



             Enter:



             _____________________________________________

             Larry D. Martin, J.S.C.