arrow left
arrow right
  • VASHONE RHODES  vs.  JAMES GOMEZ, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • VASHONE RHODES  vs.  JAMES GOMEZ, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED DALLAS COUNTY 11/27/2019 3:58 PM 50508-2 50508-2 FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK NO. DC-19-10926 DC-l9—10926 Terri Kilgore VASHONE RHODES § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 1N § § . VS. VS. § § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS § § JAMES GOMEZ § § 160TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 203 I 1. That this 1. this Deposition by by Written Written Questions Questions of ofthe the Custodian Custodian of Insurance Records of Insurance Records for for: GEICO isis aa true true and and exact exact : duplicate of duplicate the records of the records pertaining to VASHONE pertaining to VASHONE RHODES, RHODES, given given by by the the witness witness named herein, herein, afler after said said witness witness was duly duly sworn byby the the officer; officer; 2. That .2.That the the transcript transcript is is a true true record record of ofthe the testimony testimony given given by by the the witness; witness; 3. 3. That $ Zv-Z/ isisthe That $_________ thecharge chargefor forthe thepreparation preparationof ofthe thecompleted completedDeposition Depositionby byWritten WrittenQuestions Questionsand andany anycopies copies of exhi of éits,charged exhiits, chargedto toAttorney Attorney for for DEFENDANT, JOHN W. BREEZE, State Bar No. BREEZE, State 00796248; No. 00796248; 4. That the 4. That the deposition deposition transcript transcript was was submitted submitted on on the the specified specifieddate date to to the the witness witnessfor forexamination, examination,signature signature and return return to to the the officer officer by by aa specified specifieddate; date; 5. That 5. That changes, changes, if if any made by the witness, witnes‘s, in in the the transcript transcript and and otherwise otherwise are are attached attachedthereto theretoor orincorporated incorporatedtherein; therein; 6. the witness 6. That the witness did did return return the the transcript; transcript; 7. That the 7. That the original original deposition deposition by by Written Written Questions, Questions, together together with with copies copies of ofall allexhibits, exhibits,were weredelivered deliveredto tothe the attorney or party who Noticed the first questions attorney or party Who Noticed the first questions for for safekeeping safekeeping and and use use at attrial; trial; 8. That pursuant 8. That pursuant to to information information made aa part part of ofthe the records records at at the the time time said said testimony testimonywas wastaken, taken, all parties partiesof ofrecord record a_ll are listed. are listed. 9. A copy ofthis 9. A of this Notice Notice of of Delivery Deliverywas wasserved servedon onall allparties partiesshown shown herr. GIVEN UNDERMY GWEN UNDER MYHAND HANDAND ANDSEAL SEAL OF OF OFFICE OFFICE on the on this this thed'ay ofofNovember, h? November, 2019. é ay 2019. Is! JO / JOHN A. KRUMH Z A. KRUMHOLTZ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS - DOCUMENT’ACQUISITION DOCUMENT ACQUISITION SERVICES 1201 RICHARDSON 1201 RIChARDSON DRIVE, DRIVE, STE STE 260 260 RICHARDSON, TX 75080 CERTIFICATE SERVICE 203 PG. 1l pfiflimmx MO A @UmHQLTZ 1 B4 ‘ a‘ \o‘avpzl’ll,’ 'XH 9&4}? \ No”)? F 8‘ Q, fag “D .' 7906mg, mTefiaS 7F74i!‘ ‘ 01 Texas _ I J Zz W1 ,. _ i‘écimy $95539. ‘HIUH q 73-5 a 9 mwefitmlggfim gyms x ‘ 13‘ gt; .«I‘n. 1 kg .4» I’lfllfignw‘ 5. § ¥ WWML . 045 1202(. 3,43%“) J