arrow left
arrow right
  • VASHONE RHODES  vs.  JAMES GOMEZ, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
  • VASHONE RHODES  vs.  JAMES GOMEZ, et alMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED DALLAS COUNTY 12/6/2019 12:47 PM 50508-3 50508—3 FELICIA PITRE NO. DC-19-10926 DC—19—10926 DISTRICT CLERK Terri Kilgore VASHONE RHODES § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § § VS. VS. § § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ‘ § V § JAMES GOMEZ § § 160TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 203 1. That 1. That this this Deposition Deposition by Written Questions by Written of the Custodian Questions ofthe Custodian of Insurance Records of Insurance Records for for: : REPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY is is aa true true and and exact exact duplicate duplicate of the records ofthe records pertaining pertaining to t0 VASHONE RHODES, given VASHONE given by by the witness th‘e witness named herein,after herein,after said said witness was duly witness'was duly sworn by sworn by the the officer; officer; 2. That the 2. That the transcript transcript is is a a true true record record of the testimony ofthe testimony given given by by the the witness; witness; 3. That 3. That $$7'7) 2 2&2 isisthe thecharge chargefor forthe thepreparation preparationof ofthe thecompleted completedDeposition Depositionby byWritten WrittenQuestions Questions and andany anycopies copies of exhibits, of exhibits, charged charged toto Attorney for DEFENDANT, JOHN W. BREEZE, State Attorney for State Bar No. 00796248; No. 00796248; 4. That the 4. That the deposition deposition transcript transcript was was submitted submitted on on the the specified specified date dateto tothe thewitness witneséfor forexamination, examination,signature signature . and return and return to to the the officer officer by by aa specified date; specified’date; 5. That changes, 5. That changes, if if any any made by by the the witness, witness, in in the the transcript transcript and and otherwise otherwise are areattached attachedthereto theretoor orincorporated incorporatedtherein; therein; 6. 6. That the the witness witness did did return return the the transcript; transcript; 7. That the 7. That the original original deposition deposition by by Written Written Questions, Questions, together together with withcopies copies of ofall anexhibits, exhibits,were weredelivered deliveredto tothe the attorney or attorney or party party who Noticed Noticed the the first questions first questions for safekeeping and use at trial; for safekeeping and use at trial; That pursuant 8. That 8. pursuant to to information information made aa part part of the records ofthe records at at the the time time said said testimony testimonywas wa§taken, taken,all allparties partiesof ofrecord record 7 are listed. are listed. 9. A copy 9. copy of this Notice ofthis Notice of of Delivery Delivery was served served on on all all parties parties shown shownherein. herein. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this this thed of November, 2019. thei2'i ofNovember, 2019. 2% is! JOIJNA. KRUML[OLTZ NOTARY PUBLIC IN/AND INiAND FOR THE STATE. OF TEXAS STATE 0F DOCUMNT ACQUISITION SERVICES DOCUMENT 1201 RICHARDSON 1201 RIChARDSON DRIVE, DRIVE, STE STE 260 260 RICHARDSON, TX 75080 CERTIFICATE SERVICE CERTIFICATE SERVICE 203 203 PG. PG. 11 ma JOHNA. KRUMHOLTZ SHOLIZ lyo’ 0,1 729."14-9 RY “mu", ID o 1,. _ 13% # 729-344; \s "a gag Noifify Publigr. mm af‘fexas ",4,S \‘1: ,f, Ffiy 1.9.1 M Commission Expiras V 04/06/2Q2fi