On July 09, 2018 a
Request,Application
was filed
involving a dispute between
Merwin, Betty,
Merwin, Lee,
Rushing, Janice,
Rushing, Lige, Jr,
and
Merwin, Betty,
Merwin, Lee,
Rushing, Janice,
Rushing, Lige, Jr.,
for PROPERTY
in the District Court of Dallas County.
Preview
FILED
11/16/2020 1:24 PM
FELICIA PITRE
DISTRICT CLERK
DALLAS CO., TEXAS
Terri Kilgore DEPUTY
CAUSE NO. DC-18-08876
LEE MERWIN AND BETTY § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
MERWIN, §
§
Plainti's, §
§
vs. § 192nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT
§
JANICE RUSI-HNG AND LIGE §
RUSHING JR., §
§
Defendants. § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
§
MERWINS’ REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
REGARDING THE COURT’S FINAL JUDGMENT
Under Texas Rule 0f Civil Procedure 296, Lee and Betty Merwin (collectively,
the “Merwins”) le this, their Request for Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
regarding the Court’s Judgments issued in this case.
RE UEST
1. On July 9, 2018, the Merwins led their original petition against Janice
Rushing and Lige Rushing, Jr.
2. On March 27, 2019, the Court Ordered its Amended Summary
Judgment Order, nding that the Merwins take nothing by their trespass t0 try title
suit, and further ordered that the Merwins’ driveway and fence encroached on the
Rushings’ property, and ordered they be removed at the Merwins’ cost and expense.
3. On October 13, 2020, the Court signed the “Second Summary Judgment
Order,” Which was an outdated order not agreed upon by the Parties. The Second
REQUEST FOR FINDlNGS 0F FACT & CONCLUSION OF LAW PAGE l
1677735V1 - M1673.00002 201 1 16 Request for FFCL - Final
Summary Judgment Order found that the MerWins have not adversely possessed
portions of the Rushings’ property described as the “Disputed Green Space” and
further found that the relief granted to the Rushings in the Summary Judgment
Order is not barred by a “de minimus doctrine” nding.
4. The Merwins and the Rushings appeared before the Court on October
13, 2020, and presented arguments to the Court as to the “de minimus” defense
asserted by the Merwins.
5. The Court signed a Judgment on October 26, 2020. The Judgment
ordered that the Partial Summary Judgment Order previously entered by this Court,
which found the Merwins have obtained no title to the Rushings by adverse
possession is now a Final Judgment. The Judgment also made additional orders
regarding the Merwins’ fence and the Rushings’ Property.
6. Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 297, the Merwins respectfully
requests that the Court a) le findings of fact and conclusions of law for its Final
Judgment, inclusive of all Summary Judgment Orders, Within twenty (20) days of
this request and b) cause a copy of its findings of fact and conclusions of law to be
mailed to each party in the suit.
REQUEST FOR FINDINGS 0F FACT & CONCLUSION OF LAW PAGE 2
1677735V1 - M1673.00002 201 1 16 Request for FFCL - Final
Respectfully submitted,
Underwood Perkins, P.C.
/s/ ScottM Gareljck
Scott M. Garelick
State Bar No. 24029053
Alex M. Campbell
State Bar No. 24095536
5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1900
Dallas, Texas 75240
Telephone: (972) 661-5114
Facsimile: (972) 661-5691
Emaili sgarelick@uplawtx.com
acampbell@uplawtX.com
Attorneys for Lee and Betty Merwjn
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on the 16th day of November 2020, a true and correct copy
of the foregoing was served on all counsel of record using the Court’s ECF system.
/s/A]eX M Campbell
Alex M. Campbell
REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSION OF LAW PAGE 3
1677735V1 - M1673.00002 201 l6 Request for FFCL - Final
1
Document Filed Date
November 16, 2020
Case Filing Date
July 09, 2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.