arrow left
arrow right
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

Kimberly FILED Oberrecht [c.s.B. No. 190794] s. Cherie A. Enge [C.s.B. No. 134998] SUPER'OR COURT 0F WW?“ Andrew B. Dorr [C.S.B. No. 3 17546] ngfigvgfifimfiwgé ' HORTON, OBERRECHT & KIRKPATRICK 101 W. Broadway, Suite 600 MAR 2 6 2021 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 232-1183 * (619) 696-5719 [facsimile] QOMfiWN By ANAIcon - mas .DE U1“? Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD WILSON; JOSE MEDINA; and COLORAMA WHOLESALE NURSERY dba COLORAMA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FAX IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1o CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT BY 11 BRIAN MAHAFFEY & ASHLEY MAHAFFEY, CASE NO. CIVDS1908657 ) 12 Plaintiff, SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 13 VS. IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 RICHARD WILSON; JOSE MEDINA; ADJUDICATION COLORAMA WHOLESALE NURSERY dba vvvvvvvvvvvv 15 COLORAMA, and DOES 1 through 100, Action Filed: March 21, 2019 Inclusive, Trial Date: July 19, 2021 16 Defendants. Dept. S30 17 18 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §437c and California Rule of Court, Rule 19 3.1350, Defendants RICHARD WESON, JOSE MEDINA, and COLORAMA WHOLESALE 20 NURSERY dba COLORAMA hereby submit the following Separate Statement of Undisp uted 21 Material Facts in Support of their Motion for Summary Adjudication: 22 MOVING PARTY’S UNDISPUTED OPPOSING PARTY’S RESPONSE AND 23 MATERIAL FACTS AND SUPPORTING SUPPORTING EVIDENCE EVIDENCE 24 1. Plaintiff was terminated from his employment with a company named Action 25 Pumping, Inc. in approximately May 2017. 26 Supporting Evidence Exhibit C; Exhibit F at 3:4-12 27 28 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPO RT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 1. 2. On May 2017, Action Pumping, Inc. 15, sent him a letter stating that as a result 0f his termination, all of the stock Plaintiff had would be relinquished and distributed to other shareholders. Supporting Evidence Exhibit C 3. Plaintiffowned approximately 20% of the shares in that company, and posits that the total value of his stock was around $2 million. Supporting Evidence Exhibit D; Exhibit F at 3 1:18—25, 33:18-34:1 filed a lawsuit against Action 4. Plaintiff Pumping, Inc. (“Action Pumping”) around October 2017. Supgorting Evidence Exhibit F at 33:10-17, 3817-1 1; Exhibit E 5. Plaintiff contends that he was wrongfully terminated and sought to recover the value of the shares that he believes were “stolen” from him. Supgorting Evidence Exhibit F at 3221-7 6. The accident giving rise to this lawsuit then happened on April 11, 2018, on the Kickapoo Trail near Highway 62 in Yucca Valley, California. Supporting Evidence Exhibit F at 11:20-23, 9728-17 7. Plaintiff eventually settled his dispute with Action Pumping around September 2019. Plaintiff signed a release and was paid a confidential amount to resolve his claim. Supporting Evidence Exhibit E; 8. Plaintiff asserts the accident giving rise to the instant lawsuit also forced him to settle the case against Action Pumping. Sumorting Evidence Exhibit F at 32: 15-20 SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPO RT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 2.