arrow left
arrow right
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
  • BRIAN MAHAFFEY, ET AL -V- RICHARD WILSON, ET AL Print Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited  document preview
						
                                

Preview

ORIGINAL Kimberly S. Oberrecht [C.S.B. No. 190794] SUPERN FA EE Drona Cherie A. Enge [C.S.B. No. 134998] INTY OF BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT Andrew B. Dorr [C.S.B. No. 317546] HORTON, OBERRECHT & KIRKPATRICK 101 W. Broadway, Suite 600 FEB 14 2023 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 232-1183 * (619) 696-5719 [facsimile] 7 < wx GREE TRIBHART, OEPUTY Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD WILSON; JOSE MEDINA; and COLORAMA WHOLESALE NURSERY dba COLORAMA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 10 CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT 11 BRIAN MAHAFFEY & ASHLEY MAHAFFEY,) CASE NO. CIVDS1908657 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF 13 vs. DEFENDANTS?’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE 14 RICHARD WILSON; JOSE MEDINA; TRIAL COLORAMA WHOLESALE NURSERY dba 15 COLORAMA, and DOES 1| through 100, Action Filed: March 21, 2019 Inclusive, Trial Date: March 6, 2023 16 Dept. S30 Defendants. 17 18 Defendants RICHARD WILSON, JOSE MEDINA and COLORAMA WHOLESALE 19 NURSERY dba COLORAMA (hereinafter collectively “Defendants”) hereby submit this 20 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of their Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial. 21 lL 22 . INTRODUCTION 23 Defendants submit this Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial in order to obtain necessary 24 documents regarding Plaintiff Brian Mahaffey’s (“Plaintiff”) alleged cardiac condition and 25 traumatic brain injury. Defendants propounded Special Interrogatories (Set Five) regarding 26 Plaintiffs treating cardiologists on November 29, 2022. Plaintiffs refused to answer until 27 Defendants filed an ex parte application that would have allowed a motion to compel. Plaintiffs 28 indicated they are in possession of treatment records already. Plaintiffs finally responded on Friday, MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL 1 7 “ wt 2 Lath eo et