arrow left
arrow right
  • Charles Somers vs. Dr. James Longoria Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Charles Somers vs. Dr. James Longoria Unlimited Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ORDER DETERMINING DISPOSITION OF EX PARTE APPLICATION CASE NAME CASE NUMBER EXPARTE-APPLICATION ORDER SHORTENING TIME 1 0 WEAR MOTION: Current Trial date / MSG date: 10 continue Trial and MSG Stipulation: • No Yesj^ee attached) Other: Opposition: • No, • Yes NAME OF APPEARING PARTY(S): Requesto Rep. In court • Phone: Other party(s) appearing: Rep.: • In court • Phone: Rep.: • In court • Phone: Rep.: • In court • Phone: The Court, having considered the above entitled ex parte application • without a hearing • after hearing with appearance(s) as noted above, rules as follows: The Request for Order Shortening Time/Application ik^hSBANXED / • DENIED on the merits of the papers presented to the Court. v • The application is denied without prejudice to its resubmission for the following reason(s): / caVThe The current Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates are vacated and Trial is reset for ^ —~- at 8:30 a.m. in Department 47. The Mandatory Settlement Conference is reset for -_, at 9:30 a.m./1:30 p.m. in Department 59. The parties are referred to the Trial Setting Process to select new trial and Mandatoj Conference dates. t 3 Trial and MSC to be selected no later than today's date. < • The matter will be heard on _ _at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47. Moving papers to be filed and served on or before . Responding Party's Opposition will be filed and served on or before _. Reply to be filed and served on or before or • Waived • The moving party must proceed by noticed motion. • Other II trial related and discovery deadlines are to be based upon the new trial date. Counsel Is directed to serve a copy of this order on all other parties. • Counsel for the is ordered to prepare a formal^f^. • Sea attached order. seiL attached ordei Vxi bp am RUSSELL L.HQ1VI ~^ DATE CM 50 (03/2018) ORIGINAL-CASE FILE m PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT