arrow left
arrow right
  • AT&T SERVICES, INC.  vs.  MASON HALL, IIIOTHER PERSONAL INJURY document preview
  • AT&T SERVICES, INC.  vs.  MASON HALL, IIIOTHER PERSONAL INJURY document preview
  • AT&T SERVICES, INC.  vs.  MASON HALL, IIIOTHER PERSONAL INJURY document preview
  • AT&T SERVICES, INC.  vs.  MASON HALL, IIIOTHER PERSONAL INJURY document preview
  • AT&T SERVICES, INC.  vs.  MASON HALL, IIIOTHER PERSONAL INJURY document preview
  • AT&T SERVICES, INC.  vs.  MASON HALL, IIIOTHER PERSONAL INJURY document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED 7/17/2023 2:30 PM FELICIA PITRE DISTRICT CLERK DALLAS CO., TEXAS Margaret Thomas DEPUTY Cause No. DC—23-07279 AT&T SERVICES, INC. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § V. § § 193RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT § MASON HALL III AND § WILLIE MAE NOBLBS § DALLASCOUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF’S VERIFIED MOTION TO RETAIN CAUSE COMES NOW Plaintiff, AT&T SERVICES, INC., and files this Verified Motion to Retain the above referenced cause and in support of same would show as follows: lam—(WM 1. On May 31, 2023, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit. 2. On June 26, 2023, Plaintiff followed up with the citations and was told the citations were issued June 5, 2023. Plaintiff informed the clerk, e—file had blacklisted Plaintiff’ s service e—mail in Dallas County for reasons unknown to Plaintiff. A ticket was opened with the e-file support team to resolve the issue. The clerk stated she would have Ms. Madeline resend the citations to the e—service email on file. 3. On June 28, 2023, Plaintiff downloaded the citations from the clerk’s website. 4. On June 30, 2023, Plaintiff sent the citations out for service via private process server. 5. On July 6, 2023, Plaintiff followed up with service and was told service had not yet been completed; however, service attempts were continuing. 6. On July l7, 2023, Plaintiff followed up with server via phone and was told on July 12, there was no answer at the door. On July 14, 2023, Defendant Willie Mae Nobles was served, the server was then informed that Defendant Mason Hall III was not home at the time. Plaintiff is currently waiting for the Affidavit of Service for Willie Mae Nobles. Service attempts for Defendant Mason Hall 111 are continuing. Good Cause 7. Plaintiff does intend to complete service for Mason Hall III. Plaintiff intends to allow the proper time for Defendant Willie Mae Nobles to file an answer with the Court. 8. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court retain this cause and, subject to completion of service of Defendant Mason Hall III and the expiration of Defendant Willie Mae Nobles’ deadline to filean answer with the Court. 9. The verification of Plaintiff’s counsel, Christopher A. Fusselman is attached. Prayer 10. Wherefore, premises considered Plaintiff respectfully prays the Court to retain this cause, and subject to completion of service for Defendant Mason Hall 111 and the expiration of Defendant Willie Mae Nobles’ deadline to file an answer with the Court. Respectfiilly submitted, THE FUSSELMAN LAW FIRM, P.C. /s/ Christotoher A. Fusselman Christopher A. Fusselman State Bar No. 00792520 Jason B. Wells State Bar No. 24066279 1616 South Voss Rd., Ste. 775 Houston, Texas 77057 (713) 960-1619 (713) 960-1430 (fax) E-Service E-Mail: e-file@thefusselmanlawfirm.c0m ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF Cause No. DC-23-07279 AT&T SERVICES, INC. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § V. § § 193RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT § MASON HALL III AND § WILLIE MAE NOBLES § DALLASCOUNTY, TEXAS VERIFICATION OF PLAINTIFF ’S COUNSEL STATE OF TEXAS § , § HARRIS COUNTY § Before me the undersigned notary, on this day personally appeared Christopher A. Fusselman, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered an oath to him, upon his oath he said he read Plaintiffs Verified Motion to Retain Cau d that all other facts stated in it are within his personal knowledge and are true and 'stOphJr A. Fusselman SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on this the 17th day of July, 2023. g’lfiYW PUBLIC, STATE OF TEXAS IAYURY TORRES Notary ID #133817253 My Commission Expires {Po June 16, 2026