On March 28, 2016 a
Motion-Secondary
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hernandez Estanislao Gomez,
and
Alcazar Ana Lidia Robles,
Avalos Jose Antonio Sanchez,
Avalos Juan Sanchez,
Does 1 To 10,
Gonzalez Amelia,
Rodriguez Candelaria,
Chaires Cesareo,
Chaires Irma,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
a
®@
ofterma, °
Robert L. Reisinger, Esq., Bar No. 156474
~:
Edye A. Hill, Esq., Bar No. 223377 D
California
FORD, WALKER, HAGGERTY & BEHAR Superior Court of banalor
One World Trade Center ‘County ~
Twenty-Seventh Floor
sep 182018
Long Beach, California 90831-2700
(562) 983-2500 vay vuncer/Clerk
Sherri K. Varese
LOTLY , Deputy
Attorneys for Defendant, ANA LIDIA ROBLES ALCAZAR By. Weather flare:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — CENTRAL DISTRICT
10
11
ESTANISLAO GOMEZ HERNANDEZ, Case No. BC614013
12
Plaintiff, HON. ELAINE LU
13 DEPT. 5
vs.
14 DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO
15 JOSE ANTONIO SANCHEZ AVALOS; JUAN PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4
SANCHEZ AVALOS; ANA LIDIA ROBLES cq tb"
16 Trial: September 19, 2018 uu
»
ALCAZAR; CANDELARIA RODRIGUEZ,
AMELIA GONZALEZ; IRMA CHAIRES; Complaint Filed: March 28, 2016
17
>
CESAREO CHAIRES; JORGE ROBELES and
18 DOES 1 TO 10, Inclusive,
19
20
Defendants. bal
21 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
22 Defendant ANA LIDIA ROBLES ALCAZAR (“Defendant”) submits this opposition to
23 Plaintiff ESTANISLAO GOMEZ HERNANDEZ’S (‘Plaintiff’) Motion in Limine No. 4 which seeks
24 to exclude Defendant, Defendant’s counsel, and all of Defendant’s witnesses from introducing any
25 evidence, argument or testimony based on Plaintiff’s decision not to call certain treating physicians
26
eo
wo 27
eo
3 28
Pee
&
mo
cs 1
DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION JN LIMINE NO. 4
Document Filed Date
September 18, 2018
Case Filing Date
March 28, 2016
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.