arrow left
arrow right
  • GEORGE NAHAS VS MERCEDES-BENZ USA LLC Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • GEORGE NAHAS VS MERCEDES-BENZ USA LLC Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED non LEHRMAN LAW GROUP “Se u. ‘Gu ot Col tnen .V Of Los Anyeles KATE S. LEHRMAN [Bar No. 123050] BENSON Y. DOUGLAS [Bar No. 206742] JAN 22 2013 ANTHONY P. GRECO [Bar No. 296398] eat eo 12121 Wilshire Boulevard Sherri p. ‘arter, Exacutive Officoz/Clerk Suite 1300 By, Deputy Los Angeles, CA 90025 Raul Sanchez (310) 917-4500 (310) 917-5677 (FAX) Attorneys for Defendant MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 ll GEORGE NAHAS, Case No. BC631893 [Filed: August 29, 2016] 12 Plaintiff, Hon. Michael J. Raphael 13 Vv. Dept. 51 14 MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, a Delaware MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 AUTHORITIES OF DEFENDANT 15 through 10, inclusive, MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION 16 Defendants. IN LIMINE NO. 1 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE REGARDING DEFENDANT’S 7 ABILITY TO REPAIR OR COST OF REPAIRING THE VEHICLE 5 18 DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: 01/16/18 19 MOTION CUT-OFF: 01/29/18 TRIAL DATE: 02/13/18 20 Siete 21 Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA or defendant) respectfully submits the en a 22 following Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to plaintiff's Motion in Liminé gz 23 No. 1 to exclude evidence regarding defendant’s ability to repair or the cost of repairing the ce 24 Vehicle: po bet 25 I wt Det 26 INTRODUCTION AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND cE po cx 27 This is a Lemon Law case under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civil Code 28 section 1790 et seq. (Song-Beverly). Plaintiff George Nahas leased a new Mercedes-Benz 365.185.TG - 00282418.DOC | BC631893 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND ALITHORITIES OF DEFENDANT MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IN LIMINE NO. { TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S ABILITY 10 REPAIR OR COST OF REPAIRING THE VEHICLE