arrow left
arrow right
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Oe FILED 2 Superior Court of Califlornm PL County af Los Anoefec NOV 28 2017 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ‘gem R. Canter, Bxecuuve vu: Heer/Liein fora COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRKC S anne we, Grae yk Deputy DEPARTMENT 93 MARIE UNDERHILL, Case No.: BC638507 Plaintiff, Hearing Date: November 28, 2017 Time: 1:30 p.m. vs. ESTATE OF TESTA; AND DOES 1 TO 100, [EESTAFFVE] ORDER RE: 10 Defendants. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO OBTAIN 11 SECOND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF 12 PLAINTIFF; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO OBTAIN MENTAL EXAMINATION OF 13 PLAINTIFF 14 MOVING PARTY: Defendant Estate of Lynne S. Testa, Deceased (erroneously sued as Estate 15 of Testa (Deceased)) 16 17 RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Marie Underhill 18 (1) Motion for Leave to Obtain Second Physical Examination of Plaintiff 19 (2) Motion for Leave to Obtain Mental Examination of Plaintiff 20 21 The court considered the moving, opposition and reply papers. 22 BACKGROUND 23 On October 26, 2016, Plaintiff Marie Underhill (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against 24 [Defendant Estate of Lynne S. Testa, Deceased (erroneously sued as Estate of Testa (Deceased)) 25 (“Defendant”) for alleged damages arising from a December 8, 2015 trip-and-fall. In responses nz 26 ao to Defendant’s Form Interrogatory Nos. 6.2 and 6.3, Plaintiff states that she has suffered a» 27 hd “‘{cJoncussion and post-concussion syndrome with memory loss, confusion, loss of