arrow left
arrow right
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Superior Court Hetal J. Kommes, State Bar No. 255838 OuntY af J, of California as Angeles MARK R. WEINER & ASSOCIATES Employees of the Law Department APR 19 201 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Sherri R, rte, ue 655 North Central Avenue, 12" Floor Uterk of Coury Glendale, California 91203-1434 By. Telephone: (818) 543-4000 / FAX: (855) 396-3606 : Deputy E-Mail Address: Cali.Law-Kommes@StateFarm.com Attorneys for defendant Estate of Lynne S. Testa, Deceased, erroneously sued and served as Estate of Testa (Deceased) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 Marie Underhill, NO. BC638507 Complaint Filed: October 26, 2016 12 Plaintiff, Judge: Hon. Dennis Landin Department: 4 13 Vv. Trial Date: May 15, 2018 14 Estate of Testa (Deceased) and Does 1 to 100, FSC: May 1, 2018 Time: 10:00 a.m. 15 Defendants. Dept.: 4 16 DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. FOUR TO 17 EXCLUDE/PRECLUDE/PROHIBIT PLAINTIFF'S USE OF OR ARGUMENT 18 REGARDING THE “GOLDEN RULE”; DECLARATION OF HETAL J. 19 KOMMES; ORDER [PROPOSED] 20 I 21 “GOLDEN RULE” EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT IS 22 IMPROPER AND PREJUDICIAL a3 "24 Defendant anticipates plaintiff will utilize and argue the “Golden Rule” during voir dire ~ 235 and trial by suggesting to the jurors they should base plaintiff's damages on an amount the jurors 26 would personally charge or accept as compensation to endure pain and suffering equivalent to 27 plaintiff's claims. The “Golden Rule” argument/strategy is prohibited by law. It also creates a 28 substantial danger of undue prejudice to defendant. -1- DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. FOUR