arrow left
arrow right
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Brown, Brown & Brown David S. Brown; Bar No. 89438 FILED Superior Court of California Joan Benjamin Brown; Bar No. 93572 Countv af Los Angeles Aaron M. Brown; Bar No. 277981 23326 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 380 MAY 07 2018 Torrance, CA 90505-3725 < Sherri R. Ca ter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Ceurt 310-378-3733; fax 310-378-0703 mrtorts@aol.com By. +Deputy Raul Sanchez Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 Marie Underhill, Plaintiff, BC638507, Dept. 4, trial 5-15-18 Vv. 12 Estate of Testa (Deceased) and Does OPPOSITION TO MOTION /N 13 1 to 100, Defendants. LIMINE 11 14 15 16 Plaintiff opposes motion in limine 11, to preclude plaintiff's liability expert Richard 17 Grossman from offering any human factors testimony. 18 19 Richard Grossman is a professional engineer licensed by the State of California 20 in the separate disciplines of Mechanical Engineering and Safety Engineering. The 21 discipline of Safety Engineering includes analyzing structures and situations from the 22 point of view of safety. It also includes physics and physical analysis. 3wT 24 While Mr. Grossman is not a human factors expert, he is a safety expert and he 60 should be permitted to testify as to safety. There may be testimony that could involve Re 2 26 oo either type of expert, but that is not grounds for the exclusion of Mr. Grossman's 27 testimony. 28 In the event there is any question regarding Mr. Grossman’s qualifications, the OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE 11 4