On October 26, 2016 a
Motion,Ex Parte
was filed
involving a dispute between
Underhill Marie,
and
Does 1 To 100,
Estate Of Testa,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
3
Brown, Brown & Brown
David S. Brown; Bar No. 89438
Joan Benjamin Brown; Bar No. 93572
FILED
Superior Court of California
Aaron M. Brown; Bar No. 277981 Cannty af Unc Anoeles
23326 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 380
Torrance, CA 90505-3725 MAY 16 2018
310-378-3733; fax 310-378-0703 Sherri R. Carver, execuuve uiniceriCierk
mrtorts@aol.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By. t
Raul Sanchez
of Court
sDeputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
10 Marie Underhill, Plaintiff, BC638507, Dept. 4, trial 5-15-18
11 Vv.
12 Estate of Testa (Deceased) and Does PLAINTIFF'S MOTION /N LIMINE 3
1 to 100, Defendants.
13
14 Plaintiff moves to preclude defendant from calling four expert witnesses to say
15
the same thing, that plaintiff does not have permanent brain damage from this accident.
16
Plaintiff moves to limit defendant to one expert witness on each subject, to preclude
17
cumulative testimony.
18
19 Defendant designated both a neuropsychologist and a neurologist to testify that
20 plaintiff does not have permanent brain damage. Defendant also intends to call two
21
other experts, Dr. Co and Dr. Cha, to testify that plaintiff does not have permanent brain
22
damage.
a 23
wn
=24 Defendant should not be allowed to call four witnesses in the hope that
oe
m25 cumulative testimony will convince the jury that the party with the most witnesses that
@
26
say similar things wins. Not only is this a waste of judicial time, it unfairly rewards the
27
party with the most money to pay physicians to testify. Defendant should pick one
28
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION /N LIMINE 3
Document Filed Date
May 16, 2018
Case Filing Date
October 26, 2016
Status
Jury Verdict 05/25/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
3 Brown, Brown & Brown David S. Brown; Bar No. 89438 Joan Benjamin Brown; Bar No. 93572 FILED Superior Court of California Aaron M. Brown; Bar No. 277981 Cannty af Unc Anoeles 23326 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 380 Torrance, CA 90505-3725 MAY 16 2018 310-378-3733; fax 310-378-0703 Sherri R. Carver, execuuve uiniceriCierk mrtorts@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff By. t Raul Sanchez of Court sDeputy SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 Marie Underhill, Plaintiff, BC638507, Dept. 4, trial 5-15-18 11 Vv. 12 Estate of Testa (Deceased) and Does PLAINTIFF'S MOTION /N LIMINE 3 1 to 100, Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff moves to preclude defendant from calling four expert witnesses to say 15 the same thing, that plaintiff does not have permanent brain damage from this accident. 16 Plaintiff moves to limit defendant to one expert witness on each subject, to preclude 17 cumulative testimony. 18 19 Defendant designated both a neuropsychologist and a neurologist to testify that 20 plaintiff does not have permanent brain damage. Defendant also intends to call two 21 other experts, Dr. Co and Dr. Cha, to testify that plaintiff does not have permanent brain 22 damage. a 23 wn =24 Defendant should not be allowed to call four witnesses in the hope that oe m25 cumulative testimony will convince the jury that the party with the most witnesses that @ 26 say similar things wins. Not only is this a waste of judicial time, it unfairly rewards the 27 party with the most money to pay physicians to testify. Defendant should pick one 28 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION /N LIMINE 3