arrow left
arrow right
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARIE UNDERHILL VS ESTATE OF TESTA Premises Liablty (e.g. slip & fall (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

or Brown, Brown & Brown David S. Brown; Bar No. 89438 Joan Benjamin Brown; Bar No. 93572 FILED Aaron M. Brown; Bar No. 277981 Superior Court of Californi Connty af Fae Anoeles 23326 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 380 Torrance, CA 90505-3725 MAY 16 2018 310-378-3733; fax 310-378-0703 x mrtorts@aol.com Sherri R. Carger, executive Utficer/Clerk of Court Attorneys for Plaintiff B sDeputy Raul Sanchez SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 Marie Underhill, Plaintiff, BC638507, Dept. 4, trial 5-15-18 11 Vv Estate of Testa (Deceased) and Does PLAINTIFE'S MOTION IN LIMINE 4 12 1 to 100, Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff moves to preclude any testimony by Jeffrey Bounds, M.D., the defense 15 neurologist, which refers or relies upon any information obtained from Charles Hinkin, 16 Ph.D. 17 18 Plaintiff was injured in a fall. Among her injuries are memory loss and loss of 19 concentration. 20 The Court allowed defendant two mental examinations of plaintiff. She was 21 examined by both a neurologist, Dr. Bounds, and a neuropsychologist, Dr. Hinkin. 22 23 Dr. Bounds examined plaintiff on December 21, 2017, and his report is dated a 1 ee~24 January 8, 2018. There is nothing in his report which states he will review or rely upon oo 25 > the neuropsychologist’s report, data, or information. 526 27 On April 16, 2018, plaintiff was examined by the neuropsychologist, Dr. Hinkin. 28 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE 4