On July 14, 2016 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Stearns Louis A. Jr.,
and
Edmunds Michael,
Edmunds Richard Bonner,
for Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
(05:18:13
p.m, 08-23-2016 [ 2 |
6195887889 @ 1Sp.m. 08-23-2016 2/6
a
Michael Rogers, State Bar No. 122450
LAMBERT & ROGERS, APLC D
Superior Fil of Califo
rni
359 West Madison Avenue, Suite 100 ‘Ounty of Los Angeles a
El Cajon, CA 92020
(619) 588-7600; Fax: (619) 588-7889 AUG 24 2016
E-mail: mrogers@lambertrogers. com
Sh eri fiear/Clerk
Attomeys for Defendant in Interpleader and Claimant By, Deputy
RICHARD BONNER EDMUNDS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CENTRAL DISTRICT
10
LOUISA. STEARNS, an individual, Case No. BC 627155
11
Plaintiff in Interpleader, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN
12 INTERPLEADER AND CLAIM TO FUNDS
VS.
13 Date Action Filed: July 14, 2016
RICHARD BONNER EDMUNDS, an individual; ) Date Set For Trial: Not Set
14 MICHAEL EDMUNDS, an individual; and DOES )
15 1 through 5, inclusive. ) CASE ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO.
Defendants in Interpleader.
) Hon. Samantha Jessner
16 ) Department 31
17
18
Defendant Richard Edmunds answers the complaint herein as follows:
19
1 Defendant admits each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8
20
2 Defendant lacks information or belief sufficient to admit or deny the allegations of
21
Paragraphs 3, 11, and 12, and on that basis deny them.
22 o
3 Defendant admits the allegations of Paragraph 7 except for the allegation that feoGe
23 2Pa
acceptable”; the offer was lower than what the property could’ ve sold for ern es a
24 abun.
by Defendant Michael Edmunds. me
25; ag a2
4 Answering Paragraph 9, Defendant denies the allegation that the funds “are equal Bo
=
26"! a
a
owned by both brothers”; they are owned by Defendant Richard Edmunds. Defendant admits that ind
27%
rH funds were to be held in a trust account until the brothers agreed on or a court ordered a dispositog, *
¢
Defendant lacks information or belief sufficient to admit or deny the balance of thei tins ofz
1 boos oS
oacg
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN INTERPLEADER AND CLAIM TO FUNDS
Document Filed Date
August 24, 2016
Case Filing Date
July 14, 2016
Category
Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Judgment by Court 02/05/2018
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
(05:18:13 p.m, 08-23-2016 [ 2 | 6195887889 @ 1Sp.m. 08-23-2016 2/6 a Michael Rogers, State Bar No. 122450 LAMBERT & ROGERS, APLC D Superior Fil of Califo rni 359 West Madison Avenue, Suite 100 ‘Ounty of Los Angeles a El Cajon, CA 92020 (619) 588-7600; Fax: (619) 588-7889 AUG 24 2016 E-mail: mrogers@lambertrogers. com Sh eri fiear/Clerk Attomeys for Defendant in Interpleader and Claimant By, Deputy RICHARD BONNER EDMUNDS SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 LOUISA. STEARNS, an individual, Case No. BC 627155 11 Plaintiff in Interpleader, ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN 12 INTERPLEADER AND CLAIM TO FUNDS VS. 13 Date Action Filed: July 14, 2016 RICHARD BONNER EDMUNDS, an individual; ) Date Set For Trial: Not Set 14 MICHAEL EDMUNDS, an individual; and DOES ) 15 1 through 5, inclusive. ) CASE ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO. Defendants in Interpleader. ) Hon. Samantha Jessner 16 ) Department 31 17 18 Defendant Richard Edmunds answers the complaint herein as follows: 19 1 Defendant admits each and every allegation set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 20 2 Defendant lacks information or belief sufficient to admit or deny the allegations of 21 Paragraphs 3, 11, and 12, and on that basis deny them. 22 o 3 Defendant admits the allegations of Paragraph 7 except for the allegation that feoGe 23 2Pa acceptable”; the offer was lower than what the property could’ ve sold for ern es a 24 abun. by Defendant Michael Edmunds. me 25; ag a2 4 Answering Paragraph 9, Defendant denies the allegation that the funds “are equal Bo = 26"! a a owned by both brothers”; they are owned by Defendant Richard Edmunds. Defendant admits that ind 27% rH funds were to be held in a trust account until the brothers agreed on or a court ordered a dispositog, * ¢ Defendant lacks information or belief sufficient to admit or deny the balance of thei tins ofz 1 boos oS oacg ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN INTERPLEADER AND CLAIM TO FUNDS