arrow left
arrow right
  • EVAN KAO VS PRIDE INDUSTRIES Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • EVAN KAO VS PRIDE INDUSTRIES Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

a 2 @ AEGIS LAW FIRM, PC KASHIF HAQUE, State Bar No. 218672 FILED CINDY PHAM, State Bar No. 286893 Superior Court of California 9811 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 100 County of Los Angeles Avo3) Irvine, California 92618 Telephone: (949) 379-6250 qos SEP 162016 Facsimile: (949) 379-6251 Sherri R, C; hae Executive Officer/Clerk Attorneys for Plaintiff EVANKAQ 2 TMP ‘Judi Lare , Beputy DENOWE HILE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 BCE 342q9 EVAN KAO, an individual, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 11 Plaintiff, 12 Disability Discrimination; vs. 13 2. Failure to Reasonably Accommodate; PRIDE INDUSTRIES, a California Failure to Engage in Interactive 14 corporation; and DOES 1 through 20 Process inclusive, 15 Retaliation; Defendants. Failure to Prevent Discrimination and 16 Retaliation; 17 Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy; 18 Violation of California Family Rights Act Leave; and 19 Retaliation in Violation of Government 20 Code § 12945.2 21 JURY TRIAL REQUESTED BY FAX 22 [UNLIMITED JURISDICTION] AVon mos Ds mo md 23 ms mm x24 = a0 zr? Q273Bs a % ~@ 24 LaF oar = mr co ee 25 ae 2a wn an he? Say 8 as 26 on = 8B @pen Bs = nS no a 27 ag aes 28 oewe oy a ao8 & -1- 295g ws 8O355 2 COMPLAINT ~