Exhibit,Appendix: MARLENE GARCIA ET AL VS ROBERT J OWIECKI ET AL

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/23/2020 03:48 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by C. Cappadona,Deputy Clerk




                          1      TERESA LI (SBN 278779)
                                 LAW OFFICES OF TERESA LI, PC
                          2      5674 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 107
                                 Pleasanton, CA 94588
                          3      Telephone:    (415) 423-3377
                                 Facsimile:    (888) 646-5493
                          4      Email: teresa@lawofficesofteresali.com
                          5    Attorneys for Plaintiffs
                               MARLENE GARCIA and J.J.
                          6
                          7
                          8                                                        SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                          9                                                   COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
                        10
                                 MARLENE GARCIA, and J.J., a minor, by )                                      Case No. BC679114
                        11       and through his guardian ad litem,    )
                                 MARLENE GARCIA                        )                                      PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
                        12                                             )                                      DEFENDANT WHITTIER CITY
                                                    Plaintiffs,        )                                      SCHOOL DISTRICT’S MOTION TO
                        13                                             )                                      SEAL EXHIBIT “G” SUBMITTED IN
                                        v.                             )                                      SUPPORT OF THE DISTRICT’S
                        14                                             )                                      MOTION FOR SUMMARY
                                 ROBERT J. OWIECKI, WHITTIER CITY )                                           ADJUDICATION
                        15       SCHOOL DISTRICT, and DOES 1 - 20,     )
                                                                       )                                      Date: April 7, 2020
                        16                          Defendants.        )                                      Time: 1:30 p.m.
                                                                       )                                      Department: C
                        17                                             )                                      Reservation ID: 110868558518
                                                                       )
                        18                                             )                                      Complaint Filed:                 October 11, 2017
                                 _____________________________________)                                       Trial Date:                      August 24, 2020
                        19
                                                                            I.    LEGAL ARGUMENT
                        20
                                 A.                   The Court Should Deny the Motion Because Otherwise, It Violates the Public’s
                        21                            First Amendment Right of Public Access and Exhibit G Was First Produced by the
                                                      Police Department Without Designation of Confidential
                        22
                                                      “Unless confidentiality is required by law, court records are presumed to be open.” (Cal.
                        23
                                 R. Court R. 2.550(c).) “The court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it expressly
                        24
                                 finds that establish: (1) There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public
                        25
                                 access to the record; (2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record; (3) A substantial
                        26
                                 probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the records is not seals; (4) The
                        27
                                 proposed sealing is narrowly tailed; and (5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the
                        28
                                 2020-03-23 - Opposition to Motion to Seal.docx                           1
                                  PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT WHITTIER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT’S MOTION TO SEAL
                                 EXHIBIT “G” SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF THE DISTRICT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION