arrow left
arrow right
  • MARLENE GARCIA ET AL VS ROBERT J OWIECKI ET AL Intentional Bodily Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (e.g., assault, vandalism, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARLENE GARCIA ET AL VS ROBERT J OWIECKI ET AL Intentional Bodily Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (e.g., assault, vandalism, etc.) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/07/2021 02:44 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by C. Cappadona,Deputy Clerk 1 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO A Professional Law Corporation 2 Marlon C Wadlington State Bar No. 192138 MWadlington@aalrr.com 3 Scott D. Danforth State Bar No. 258382 SDanforth@aalrr.com 4 12800 Center Court Drive South, Suite 300 Cerritos, California 90703-9364 5 Telephone: (562) 653-3200 Fax: (562) 653-3333 6 [Fee exempt Pursuant to 7 Attorneys for Defendant WHITTIER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Govt. Code § 6103] 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, NORWALK COURTHOUSE 10 11 MARLENE GARCIA, and J.J., a minor, by Case No. BC679114 12800 CENTER COURT DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 300 12 and through his guardian ad litem, CERRITOS, CALIFORNIA 90703-9364 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MARLENE GARCIA, DEFENDANT WHITTIER CITY TELEPHONE: (562) 653-3200 13 SCHOOL DISTRICT’S REPLY TO FAX: (562) 653-3333 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO 14 AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL v. PLAINTIFF’S MENTAL EXAMINATION, 15 SESSION TWO; DECLARATION OF ROBERT J. OWIECKI, WHITTIER CITY SCOTT D. DANFORTH 16 SCHOOL DISTRICT, and DOES 1-20, DATE: September 14, 2021 17 Defendants. TIME: 9:30 a.m. DEPT: C 18 Reservation No.: 097939046987 19 Complaint Filed: October 11, 2017 Trial Date: October 22, 2021 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD: 22 Defendant WHITTIER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, (hereinafter “District”), hereby files 23 its Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to its Amended Motion to Compel as follows: 24 25 26 27 28 006148.00037 34324998.1 REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S MENTAL EXAMINATION, SESSION TWO