arrow left
arrow right
  • CITY OF LOS ANGELES VS KULSUM B FAROOQUI ET AL Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CITY OF LOS ANGELES VS KULSUM B FAROOQUI ET AL Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

“* KULSUM FAROOQUI, F Califognia 5331 SO. CENTINELA AVENUE ‘Sup erior Court of Count tv of Los Angele LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 310.821.2685 MAY 09 2018 ORIGINAL lerk of Court Sherri R. Ca er, Executive Officer/C Defendant By. < aut Sar ck 2: Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CASE NO. BC678219 11 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO 12 MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS Vv COUNSEL ‘ 13 14 KULSUM B. FAROOQUI DATE: May 22, 2018 TIME: 8:30 am 15 Defendant, DEPT: 49° 16 Defendant, KULSUM B. FAROOQUI, files het Opposition to Defendant Attorney’s 17 18 Motion to be Relieved as Counsel-Civil, as follows: 19 1. Iam the Defendant in this matter. The Law Firm of Collins Law Group, LLC was 20 retained to handled this matter for me. A substantial sum of money has been paid to this law 21 firm as and for a retainer. As a matter of fact over $4,000.00 has been paid as and for attorney’s 22 fees. The attorney is continuously asking for more money. I indicated to the attorney that he 23 would get additional money when the case is settle. He tends to disagree with this statement. 24: 25,Ra My attorneys call and speak with my son and my son-in-law, as opposed to speaking 2 267)Ral directly with me. I have telephone messages, e-mails and other documentation showing 27 28 SORES res