Preview
DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,
VICTORIA HARP, E S
RODRIGUEZ & AS
ES
SB
8¢
TATES.
Qa spasyons
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
1128 TRUXTUN AVENUE
BAKERSFIELD, CA 01
PHONE (661) 323-1400 FAX (661) 323-0132
Attorneys for G.V., a minor by and through her guardian ad litem,
JOSEP! F. ETIE) NNE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN
METROPOLITAN DIVISION
10
Case No.: BCV-21-102017-DZ
11
G.V., a minor by and through her guardian ad:
12 litem JOSEPH F. ETIENNE PETITION FOR ORDER
TERMINATING JOSEPH F
13 ETIENNE AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM
Plaintiffs, FOR PLAINTIFF, G.V.;
14 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
ALRBORITIES; [PROPOSED]
15 vs.
16
KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT;
17 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL MELISSA RIZO;
18
DEAN OF STUDENTS STEVEN
a
ANDERSON; TEACHER ERIN
19 WHEELER; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive Complaint Filed: 8/30/2021
20 Trial Date: 05/28/2024
Defendants.
21
22
23 PETITION
24
25 1. Petitioners are: (a) Plaintiff, G.V.; and (b) her current Guardian ad Litem, JOSEPH
26 F. ETIENNE.
27
28 2. Plaintiff, G.V., was born on July 6, 2005.
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING JOSEPH F. ETIENNE AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF, G.V.;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Petitioner, JOSEPH F. ETIENNE, was appointed ad Guardian ad Litem for
Plaintiff, G.V., by Order of this Court dated September 7, 2921.
At the time of the Complaint was filed in this action, Plaintiff, G.V., was a minor.
Thus, it was necessary to have a Guardian ad Litem appointed in order to initiate
the lawsuit and protect her rights and interest in this matter.
Plaintiff, G.V. is no longer a minor. Plaintiff, G.V. is now a competent adult, is
able to manage her own affairs, understands and appreciates the rights, duties,
10 responsibilities, and probable consequences that accompany his decisions, and
in therefore, no longer requires a Guardian ad Litem to protect her rights and interests
42 in this matter.
13
14 THEREFORE: Petitioner, G.V., a Plaintiff herein, and Petitioner, JOSEPH F.
1s ETIENNE, her current Guardian ad Litem, request that the Court terminate the
16 appointment of JOSEPH F. ETIENNE as Guardian ad Litem for Plaintiff, G.V. on
17
the grounds demonstrated above.
18
19
DATED: August _, 2023 On
21 G.V., Plaintiff
22
\ oH
23
\
24 DATED: August&___, 2023
25 JOSEP ap ra Guardian
Ad Lite!
26
27
28
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING JOSEPH F, ETIENNE AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF, G.V.;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND ey aon: [PROPOSED] ORDER
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
I INTRODUCTION
Petitioners are (a) Plaintiff, G.V.; and (b) her current Guardian ad Litem, JOSEPH F.
ETIENNE. Petitioners request that the Court terminate the appointment of JOSEPH
F. ETIENNE as Guardian ad Litem for Plaintiff, G.V., on the grounds that Plaintiff,
G.V., is no longer a minor.
IL. THE COURT SHOULD GRANT THE APPLICATION
At the time the Complaint was filed in this action, Plaintiff, G.V., was a minor. As
10
demonstrated in the attached Petition, Plaintiff, G.V. is no longer a minor, and
i therefore, does not require a Guardian ad Litem to protect her interests in this matter
12 Thus, the appointment of JOSEPH F. ETIENNE, as Guardian ad Litem for Plaintiff,
G.V. should be terminated.
13
14 Removal of a Guardian ad Litem and termination of the guardianship lies entirely
within the power of the Court that appointed the Guardian. In re Hathaway’s Estate
15
(1896) 111 Cal. 270; In re Corotto (1954)125 Cal.App.2d 314.
16
17
Appointment of a Guardian ad Litem is appropriate where a party to an action is
incapacitated or incompetent. See Cal. Civ. Pro. Code § 372; Cal. Prob. Code §
18 1801. A Guardian ad Litem is no longer required where, as here, the party is no
19 longer incapacitated or incompetent. See id.
20
Til. CONCLUSION
21
For the foregoing reason, the Court should grant the Petition and enter an Order
22
terminating the appointment of JOSEPH F. ETIENNE as Guardian ad Litem for
23 Plaintiff, G.V.
24
DATED: August 4, 2023 RODRIGUEZ& ASSOCIATES
25
26
By:
27
VICTORIA L. HARP, ESQ.
28 Attorney for Plaintiff
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING JOSEPH F. ETIENNE AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF, G.V.;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
-3
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF KERN
I am employed in the County of Kern, State of California. I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 1128 Truxtun Avenue,
Bakersfield, California 93301
On August 4, 2022, I served the foregoing document described as follows:
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING JOSEPH F. ETIENNE AS
GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF, G.V.; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
10 AND AUTHORITIES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
il
X__ by placing the true copies thereof by placing the original
12
addressed as follows:
13
14 Steve Harber, Esq.
15 Amy Evenstad, Esq. Attorney for Defendants and Cross-
Eric Ovitz, Esq. Complainant:
16 KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISCTRIC,
McCUNE & HARBER, LLP
17 515 South Figueroa Street, Ste. 1100 MELISA RIZO, STEVEN ANDERSON,
Los Angeles, CA 90071 and ERIN WHEELER
18
Phone: (213) 689-2500
19 Fax No.: (213) 689-2501
20
E-mail: sharber@mccuneharber.com
eovitz@ mccuneharber.com
21 aevenstad @ mccuneharber.com
malvarez@ mecuneharber.com
22
hkee@ mccuneharber.com
23 apolk@mecuneharber.com
24
25
26
BY MAIL - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope and caused such
27
envelope to be deposited in the mail at Bakersfield, California. The envelope was mailed
28 with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am “readily familiar” with this firm’s practice of
collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S.
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING JOSEPH F. ETIENNE AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF, G.V.;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
-4
Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on
motion of party, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date
is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing affidavit.
BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope
and caused it to be deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by the express
service carrier, or delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized by the express
service carrier to receive documents, in an envelope or package designated by the express
service carrier with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to the person on whom it is
to be served, at the office address as last given by that person.
X_ BY EMAIL OR ELECTRONIC FILING/SERVICE — Based upon a court order,
local Rules of Court, or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic
10
transmission, I caused the documents to be sent/electronically served to the persons at the e-
I mail addresses listed. (C.C.P. § 1010.6; and CRC § 2.251).
12
13
BY FACSIMILE - I caused such document to be transmitted to a facsimile machine
14 maintained by the person on whom it is served at the facsimile machine telephone number
as last given by that person.
15
16 BY PERSONAL SERVICE - I enclosed such document in a sealed envelope and
17
caused it to be delivered by hand to the offices of the addressee(s).
18
Executed on August 4, 2022, at Bakersfield, California.
19
X_ (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
20
California that the above is true and correct.
21
22
23
24
“Rede Yralear
Phoebe Lucker
25
26
27
28
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING JOSEPH F. ETIENNE AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PLAINTIFF, G.V.;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
-5