On December 27, 2017 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sierra Annette,
and
The City Of Los Angeles,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court
of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/20/2019 01:48 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by F. Ochoa,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nae, Stale
Bar numbor and aeRO Hennig(No. 174646) FOR COURT USE ONLY
Brandon Ruiz (No. 264603) Sam Brown (No. 308558)
Hennig Ruiz & Singh, 3600 Wilshire Bivd., Suite 1908
Los Angeles, California
‘eLEPHONE NO. (213) 310-8301 FAK NO. (Opiiona?: (243) 310-8302
EMAIL ADDRESS (Optionaly
ATTORNEY FOR (Name). Plaintiff Annette Sierra
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
sTreeTappress: 111 N. Hill
MAILING ADDRESS:
cry AND ZIP cone: Lag Angeles, 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Annette Sierra
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: City of Los Angeles
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one). UNLIMITED CASE [7] umirep case BC 688510
{Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: May 31, 2019 Time: 8:30am Dept: 53 Div. Room
Address of court (if different from the address above).
[J Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name).
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
vat or parties (answer one):
This statement is submitted by party (name): Annette Sierra
b [1 This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a, The complaint was filed on (date).
b. [J] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date).
Service (fo be answered by plaintifis and crass-complainants only)
All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
» CO The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
@ have not been served (specify names and explain why not).
(2) [2] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names).
(3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names):
« Lo The foliowing additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
Description of case
a. Type
of case in [4] complaint [2] cross complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Plaintiff brings claims for: (1) FEHA-Failure to Accommodate; (2) FEHA-Fallure To Engage in the Interactive
Process; (3) FEHA-Discrimination; (4) FEHA-Failure to Prevent Discrimination/Harassment
Page 1 of §
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rules of Court,
udicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730
GMe110 [Rev July 4, 2011] wun.courts.ca. gov
Document Filed Date
May 20, 2019
Case Filing Date
December 27, 2017
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/13/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.