arrow left
arrow right
  • ANNETTE SIERRA VS THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ANNETTE SIERRA VS THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/20/2019 01:48 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by F. Ochoa,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Nae, Stale Bar numbor and aeRO Hennig(No. 174646) FOR COURT USE ONLY Brandon Ruiz (No. 264603) Sam Brown (No. 308558) Hennig Ruiz & Singh, 3600 Wilshire Bivd., Suite 1908 Los Angeles, California ‘eLEPHONE NO. (213) 310-8301 FAK NO. (Opiiona?: (243) 310-8302 EMAIL ADDRESS (Optionaly ATTORNEY FOR (Name). Plaintiff Annette Sierra SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles sTreeTappress: 111 N. Hill MAILING ADDRESS: cry AND ZIP cone: Lag Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Annette Sierra DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: City of Los Angeles CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one). UNLIMITED CASE [7] umirep case BC 688510 {Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: May 31, 2019 Time: 8:30am Dept: 53 Div. Room Address of court (if different from the address above). [J Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name). INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. vat or parties (answer one): This statement is submitted by party (name): Annette Sierra b [1 This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a, The complaint was filed on (date). b. [J] The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date). Service (fo be answered by plaintifis and crass-complainants only) All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. » CO The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint @ have not been served (specify names and explain why not). (2) [2] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names). (3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): « Lo The foliowing additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): Description of case a. Type of case in [4] complaint [2] cross complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiff brings claims for: (1) FEHA-Failure to Accommodate; (2) FEHA-Fallure To Engage in the Interactive Process; (3) FEHA-Discrimination; (4) FEHA-Failure to Prevent Discrimination/Harassment Page 1 of § Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rules of Court, udicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730 GMe110 [Rev July 4, 2011] wun.courts.ca. gov