On December 27, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sierra Annette,
and
The City Of Los Angeles,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 53
BC688510 October 14, 2021
ANNETTE SIERRA VS THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES 10:00 AM
Judge: Honorable Robert B. Broadbelt CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: K. Mason ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: C. Vaughn Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): Annette Sierra by Sam Brown (Telephonic)
For Defendant(s): Linda Miller Savitt, Esq. by Philip L. Reznik (Telephonic)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Responses to: 1)
Special Interrogatories, (Set 2); 2) Requests for Admission (Set 1); and 3) Form Interrogatories -
Employment Law (Set 2); Hearing on Ex Parte Application for Order Striking Defendant's
Separate Statement;
The Ex Parte Application and the opposition filed thereto are read and considered by the court in
chambers. Notice is proper. The matter is not called for hearing.
The Ex Parte Application STRIKING DEFENDANTS SEPARATE STATEMENT filed by
Annette Sierra on 10/13/2021 is Denied.
Plaintiff has filed an ex parte application to strike defendant’s separate statement filed in support
of defendant’s motion to compel further responses to (1) special interrogatories, (2) requests for
admission, and (3) form interrogatories – employment law. In essence, defendant filed a separate
statement in support of that motion to compel further responses on May 25, 2021, with a proof of
service stating that it was served by e-mail on plaintiff’s counsel on that date, but plaintiff’s
counsel claim that they did not receive service of the separate statement.
The court denies plaintiff’s ex parte application to strike defendant’s separate statement in
support of defendant’s motion to compel further responses, filed May 25, 2021. But the court
further orders:
(A) The hearing on defendant’s motion to compel further responses to (1) special interrogatories,
(2) requests for admission, and (3) form interrogatories – employment law is continued from
October 14, 2021 to January 21, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., in Department 53;
(B) Defendant shall re-serve its separate statement filed in support of that motion on plaintiff’s
counsel no later than October 15, 2021, and file a proof of service with the court no later than
October 22, 2021;
Minute Order Page 1 of 2
Document Filed Date
October 14, 2021
Case Filing Date
December 27, 2017
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/13/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 53 BC688510 October 14, 2021 ANNETTE SIERRA VS THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES 10:00 AM Judge: Honorable Robert B. Broadbelt CSR: None Judicial Assistant: K. Mason ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: C. Vaughn Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Annette Sierra by Sam Brown (Telephonic) For Defendant(s): Linda Miller Savitt, Esq. by Philip L. Reznik (Telephonic) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Responses to: 1) Special Interrogatories, (Set 2); 2) Requests for Admission (Set 1); and 3) Form Interrogatories - Employment Law (Set 2); Hearing on Ex Parte Application for Order Striking Defendant's Separate Statement; The Ex Parte Application and the opposition filed thereto are read and considered by the court in chambers. Notice is proper. The matter is not called for hearing. The Ex Parte Application STRIKING DEFENDANTS SEPARATE STATEMENT filed by Annette Sierra on 10/13/2021 is Denied. Plaintiff has filed an ex parte application to strike defendant’s separate statement filed in support of defendant’s motion to compel further responses to (1) special interrogatories, (2) requests for admission, and (3) form interrogatories – employment law. In essence, defendant filed a separate statement in support of that motion to compel further responses on May 25, 2021, with a proof of service stating that it was served by e-mail on plaintiff’s counsel on that date, but plaintiff’s counsel claim that they did not receive service of the separate statement. The court denies plaintiff’s ex parte application to strike defendant’s separate statement in support of defendant’s motion to compel further responses, filed May 25, 2021. But the court further orders: (A) The hearing on defendant’s motion to compel further responses to (1) special interrogatories, (2) requests for admission, and (3) form interrogatories – employment law is continued from October 14, 2021 to January 21, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., in Department 53; (B) Defendant shall re-serve its separate statement filed in support of that motion on plaintiff’s counsel no later than October 15, 2021, and file a proof of service with the court no later than October 22, 2021; Minute Order Page 1 of 2