On December 27, 2017 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Sierra Annette,
and
The City Of Los Angeles,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Sy
‘Ounty of L, of ¢ alitomia
hips
Sherri
By. Scutiy
ICerClerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA lason K~ eputy
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — CENTRAL DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT 53
ANNETTE SIERRA; Case No.: BC688510
Plaintiff, Hearing Date: April 1, 2022
Time: 10:00 a.m.
VS.
10
fPENPATE+E} ORDER RE:
THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
13 ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES
14
MOVING PARTY: Defendant City of Los Angeles
15
IRESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Annette Sierra
16
17 Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues
18 The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in connection with
19 this motion.
20
EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
21
The court notes that Plaintiff has included objections to evidence within her Separate
22
Statement cf Material Facts. “All written objections to eviderce must be served and filed
23
separately from the other papers in support of or in opposition to the motion.” (Cal. Rules of Ct. |
24
rule 3.1354, subd. (b).) Plaintiff has not filed objections sepatately from the Separate Statement.
25
The court therefore declines to rule on Plaintiff's objections.
26
The court rules on Defendant’s evidentiary objections, filed March 15, 2021, as follows:
27
The court sustains Objection No. 3.
28
Document Filed Date
April 01, 2022
Case Filing Date
December 27, 2017
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 11/13/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Sy ‘Ounty of L, of ¢ alitomia hips Sherri By. Scutiy ICerClerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA lason K~ eputy COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — CENTRAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT 53 ANNETTE SIERRA; Case No.: BC688510 Plaintiff, Hearing Date: April 1, 2022 Time: 10:00 a.m. VS. 10 fPENPATE+E} ORDER RE: THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 13 ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES 14 MOVING PARTY: Defendant City of Los Angeles 15 IRESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Annette Sierra 16 17 Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues 18 The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in connection with 19 this motion. 20 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS 21 The court notes that Plaintiff has included objections to evidence within her Separate 22 Statement cf Material Facts. “All written objections to eviderce must be served and filed 23 separately from the other papers in support of or in opposition to the motion.” (Cal. Rules of Ct. | 24 rule 3.1354, subd. (b).) Plaintiff has not filed objections sepatately from the Separate Statement. 25 The court therefore declines to rule on Plaintiff's objections. 26 The court rules on Defendant’s evidentiary objections, filed March 15, 2021, as follows: 27 The court sustains Objection No. 3. 28