arrow left
arrow right
  • ANNETTE SIERRA VS THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ANNETTE SIERRA VS THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/18/2022 11:18 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by K. Hung,Deputy Clerk 1 ROB HENNIG (STATE BAR NO. 174646) SAM BROWN (STATE BAR NO. 308558) 2 HENNIG KRAMER RUIZ & SINGH, LLP 3 3600 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 1908 LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 4 PHONE: (213) 310-8301 FAX: (213) 310-8302 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Annette Sierra 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 10 11 ANNETTE SIERRA, an individual, CASE NO. BC 688510 12 Plaintiff, [Assigned to Hon. Robert B. Broadbelt] Dept. 53] 13 vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO.1: 14 THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public TO EXCLUDE ALL TESTIMONY AND entity; and DOES 1 through 40, inclusive, EVIDENCE REGARDING ANY ALLEGED 15 NEGATIVE, DEFICIENT, OR Defendants. UNSATISFACTORY JOB PERFORMANCE 16 OF PLAINTIFF; DECLARATION OF SAM BROWN 17 18 Action Filed: December 27, 2017 FSC Date: October 28, 2022 19 Trial Date: November 16, 2022 20 21 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD IN THIS ACTION: 23 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on October 28, 2022 at 11:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter 24 as counsel can be heard, Plaintiff ANNETTE SIERRA (“Plaintiff” or “Sierra”) will make a 25 Motion in limine (Number 1) for an order excluding evidence or testimony regarding any alleged, 26 negative, deficient and/or or unsatisfactory job performance by Plaintiff, including but not limited 27 to her time in the Truancy Prevention Program (“TPP”) while she worked for Defendant THE 28 CITY OF LOS ANGELES (“Defendant” or “COLA”). Plaintiff’s job performance—particularly 1 PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1