arrow left
arrow right
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS RAQUEL SISAYAN LLC Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS RAQUEL SISAYAN LLC Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

® @ PATRICIA A. CIRUCCI, State Bar No. 210574 LISA DeLORME, State Bar No. 198940 Superior Court of Californi a 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, 3“ Floor County of Los Angeles Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: 626-302-6889 AUG-02 2018 Facsimile: 626-302-6997 Shei rik iets caeCuUve Utiicer/Cierk of Court By._Le Cc + Deputy Attorney for Defendant, Southern California Edison Company’ lortétta Robinson SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 11 ANTELOPE VALLEY-EAST KERN WATER ) CASE NO. BC707828 AGENCY, a Public Agency, ) 12 ) DSt 13 ) ANSWER OF DEFENDANT SOUTHERN Plaintiff, ) CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY TO 14 ) COMPLAINT IN EMINENT DOMAIN Vv. ) 15 RAQUEL SISAYAN, LLC, etc.; et al., ) 16 ) ) Action Filed: May 25, 2018 Defendants. 17 ) Trial Date: None Set ) 18 ) 19 ) ) 20 ) Defendants, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ("Edison"), hereby 21 answers the Complaint on file herein and admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 22 1 Answering Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Edison 23 lacks sufficient information or belief to enable it to answer the allegations contained therein, 24 and based on such lack of information or belief, denies each and every allegation. 25 2 Answering Paragraph 4 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Edison affirmatively alleges 26 that it has an easement interest(s) in the real property described in the Complaint. Edison’s 27 28 EDISON’S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN EMINENT DOMAIN