arrow left
arrow right
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS RAQUEL SISAYAN LLC Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ANTELOPE VALLEY EAST KERN WATER AGENCY VS RAQUEL SISAYAN LLC Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

BS @ e CM-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (ame, Stale Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Gary A. Kovacic/ D. Daniel Pranata SBN: 71546 216052 SULLIVAN WORKMAN & DEE 600 N. ROSEMEAD BLVD., SUITE 209 Pasadena, CA 91107 TELEPHONE NO.: 213-624-5544 FAX NO, (Optional): 13-627-7 128 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): gkovacic@swdlaw.net ATTORNEY FOR (Neme): Raquel Sisayan, LLC sy @rigr Court aSf Califo rn ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFLOS ANGELES ‘Ounty of Lo: s Angeles ia street Aooress:1 11 North Hill Street aILING Aopress:111 North Hill Street SEP 06 2013 ote city AND zip coe:Los Angeles, 90012 Sherri R. Carter, Executive Offi Icey t/ Clerk BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse By, lancy Alvarez Deputy PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Raquel Sisayan, LLC CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): [2] uNuimitep case C5 tmitep case BC707828 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date:9/27/18 Time:9:00 Dept.:54 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):Gary A. Kovacic INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 4 Party or parties (answer one): a. [2X] This statement is submitted by party (name):Defendant Raquel Sisayan, LLC b. [_] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. “Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a The complaint was filed on (date): b. Co The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a [1] al parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) [shave had a default entered against them (specify names): c. (] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4: Description of case a Type of casein [X] complaint C4 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Eminent Domain Po nes = Page of 5 Form. “Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Councit of California tules 3.720-3. ‘CM-110 Rev, July 1, 2011} www.courts.ca.gov Westlaw Doc & Form Builder