On May 25, 2018 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency,
and
All Persons Unknown Claiming An Interest Etal,
Raquel Sisayan Llc,
Southern California Edison Company,
for Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
BS
@ e CM-110
"ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (ame, Stale Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY
Gary A. Kovacic/ D. Daniel Pranata SBN: 71546 216052
SULLIVAN WORKMAN & DEE
600 N. ROSEMEAD BLVD., SUITE 209
Pasadena, CA 91107
TELEPHONE NO.: 213-624-5544 FAX NO, (Optional): 13-627-7 128
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): gkovacic@swdlaw.net
ATTORNEY FOR (Neme): Raquel Sisayan, LLC sy @rigr Court aSf Califo
rn
‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFLOS ANGELES ‘Ounty of Lo: s Angeles ia
street Aooress:1 11 North Hill Street
aILING Aopress:111 North Hill Street SEP 06 2013
ote
city AND zip coe:Los Angeles, 90012 Sherri R. Carter, Executive Offi
Icey t/ Clerk
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse By,
lancy Alvarez Deputy
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Raquel Sisayan, LLC
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): [2] uNuimitep case C5 tmitep case BC707828
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date:9/27/18 Time:9:00 Dept.:54 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):Gary A. Kovacic
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
4 Party or parties (answer one):
a. [2X] This statement is submitted by party (name):Defendant Raquel Sisayan, LLC
b. [_] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. “Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a The complaint was filed on (date):
b. Co The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a [1] al parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. [] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) [1 have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) [shave had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. (] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4: Description of case
a Type of casein [X] complaint C4 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Eminent Domain
Po
nes
=
Page of 5
Form. “Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Councit of California tules 3.720-3.
‘CM-110 Rev, July 1, 2011} www.courts.ca.gov
Westlaw
Doc & Form Builder
Document Filed Date
September 06, 2018
Case Filing Date
May 25, 2018
Category
Eminent Domain/Condemnation (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Consolidated (Non-lead case) 02/01/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.