On April 18, 2018 a
Motion in Limine - MOTION IN LIMINE PLAINTIFF WEBSPECTATOR CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION IN LIMINE #2 TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE REFERRING TO OR REGARDING CLAIMS THAT THE COURT IN T
was filed
involving a dispute between
Webspectator Corporation,
and
Holscher Mark Charles,
Kirkland & Ellis Llp,
for Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/09/2019 02:32 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Lara,Deputy Clerk
I THE MALONEY FIRM, APC
PATzuCK M. MALONEY - state Bar No. 1e7844
2 CARL I. S. MUELLER - state Bar No.294e09
2381 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 405
3 El Segundo, California 90245
Telephone: (3 1 0) 540-1 505
4 Facsimile: (3 1 0) 540-1 507
5 Attomeys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant
WEBSPECTATOR CORPORATION
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
l0
11 WEB SPECTATOR CORPORATION, Case No. 8C702466
Judge: Dennis J. Landin
I2 a Delaware Corporation Dept.: 51
Complaint Filed: April 18, 2018
13 Plaintiff,
t4
PLAINTIFF WEBSPECTATOR
CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF MOTION
15 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, a Limited AND MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2TO
Liability Partnership, and MARK CHARLES EXCLUDE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE
16 HOLSCHER, an individual, and DOES 1-50,
REFERRING TO OR REGARDING
17 Defendant.
CLAIMS THAT THE COURT IN "THE 225
ACTION APPROVED DEFENDANTS'
18
REPRESENTATION OF WEBSPECTATOR
19
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, a Limited
20 Liability Partnership, Complaint Filed: April 18,2018
Trial Date: November 12,2019
21 Cross-Complainant, FSC: November 1,2019
22 V.
WEBSPECTATOR CORPORATION,
23 a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,
24
Cross-Defendants.
25
26
REDACTED --
27 PUBLICLY FILED
28
00164282
MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANTS CEASING THEIR
REPRESENTATION OF WEBSPECTATOR ON MARCH 6, 2OI7
Document Filed Date
October 09, 2019
Case Filing Date
April 18, 2018
Category
Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 10/21/2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/09/2019 02:32 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Lara,Deputy Clerk I THE MALONEY FIRM, APC PATzuCK M. MALONEY - state Bar No. 1e7844 2 CARL I. S. MUELLER - state Bar No.294e09 2381 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 405 3 El Segundo, California 90245 Telephone: (3 1 0) 540-1 505 4 Facsimile: (3 1 0) 540-1 507 5 Attomeys for Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant WEBSPECTATOR CORPORATION 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES l0 11 WEB SPECTATOR CORPORATION, Case No. 8C702466 Judge: Dennis J. Landin I2 a Delaware Corporation Dept.: 51 Complaint Filed: April 18, 2018 13 Plaintiff, t4 PLAINTIFF WEBSPECTATOR CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF MOTION 15 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, a Limited AND MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2TO Liability Partnership, and MARK CHARLES EXCLUDE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE 16 HOLSCHER, an individual, and DOES 1-50, REFERRING TO OR REGARDING 17 Defendant. CLAIMS THAT THE COURT IN "THE 225 ACTION APPROVED DEFENDANTS' 18 REPRESENTATION OF WEBSPECTATOR 19 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, a Limited 20 Liability Partnership, Complaint Filed: April 18,2018 Trial Date: November 12,2019 21 Cross-Complainant, FSC: November 1,2019 22 V. WEBSPECTATOR CORPORATION, 23 a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 24 Cross-Defendants. 25 26 REDACTED -- 27 PUBLICLY FILED 28 00164282 MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 2 TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANTS CEASING THEIR REPRESENTATION OF WEBSPECTATOR ON MARCH 6, 2OI7