Motion-Secondary: RANCHO-V-A&B HOTELS Print

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                JASON P. SACCUZZO (Bar No. 221837)                        COUNTY. Fs      ANARDINO
                                                                SAN BERN. 2 ee DISTRICT
      saccuzzo@vivolilaw.com
     VIVOLI SACCUZZO, LLP                                             MAY 0 8 2023
     3104 Fourth Avenue
     San Diego, California 92103
     (619) 744-9992 (Tel)
     (619) 744-9994 (Fax)                                      0 leauge
     Attorneys for Plaintiff,
     RANCHO DEL CHINO,             LLC

                           SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                   COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO - SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT

     RANCHO DEL CHINO, LLC, a California                   ) CASE    NO.: CIVDS1929675
10   limited liability company;
                                                           ) PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO
11                    Plaintiff,                           ) DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER TO
                                                           ) THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
12
             VS.                                           )
13                                                         ) Date:    May 18, 2023
     A&B HOTEL MANAGEMENT                                  ) Time:    9:00 a.m.
14   INVESTMENT, INC., a California corporation;           ) Dept.    S17
15   MAA BYU HOSPITALITY LLC (DOE 1),                      )
     California limited liability company; A&B             ) Action Filed:   October 9, 2019
16   CHINO HOTELS, LLC, a California limited               ) TAC Filed:      May 31, 2022
     liability company; JS HOTEL                           ) Trial Date:     Not Set
17   DEVELOPMENT, INC., a California                       )
18   corporation; BHARAT “BRETT” MARU, an
     individual;   and DOES 2-20, inclusive,               )
19                                                         )
20
                      Defendant.                           )
                                                           )
21
22

23

24
25
26
27
28


                                                       1

              PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONT TO DEFENDANTS’   DEMURRER TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
      INTRODUCTION

      STATEMENT OF FACTS             ween

      2.1.   The Restriction and Easement Agreement (“REA”)
      2.2.   Maru’s Transfers of the Hotel Parcel
      2.3    The Amount Owed

      LEGAL STANDARD.

      LEGAL ARGUMENT
      41     Defendants Failed to Properly Meet and Confer
 10
      4.2,   The REA Runs With the Land and is Binding on All Owners of the
11           Property and Their Successors
 12   43     Plaintiff Adequately Pleds a Cause of Action for Fraudulent Transfer        11
13
      44     There are No Facts in the TAC or Otherwise Judicially Noticeable
14           Facts Supporting Defendants’ Assertion that Plaintiff Waived its Claims ... 12
15
      4.5.   Defendants’ Laches Defense is Specious                                      14
16
      4.6    Defendants’ Estoppel Defense is Baseless                                    14
17
      CONCLUSION                                                                         15
18

19
20

21
22

23
24
25

26

27
28




       PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ DEMORRER TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT