arrow left
arrow right
  • ROSETTE SAHAGEN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ROSETTE SAHAGEN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. Premises Liability (e.g.slip & fall) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED b} Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/20/2019 03:45 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by Y. Tarasyuk,Deputy Clerk 1 ERIC J. WAYNE (SBN 134844) ewayne@waynelaw.net PETER P. SALOMONE (SBN: 67399) psalomone@waynelaw.net WAYNE & ASSOCIATES 21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 2060 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: (818) 716-2727 Facsimile: (818) 716-2728 Attorneys for Defendant SP PLUS CORPORATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 ROSETTE SAHAGEN, CASE NO. 18STCV03402 [Complaint filed 10/30/18; Dept. 3] 12 Plaintiff, SP PLUS CORPORATION’S 13 VS. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 14 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS 15 ANGELES, THE TAUBMAN COMPANY, LLC, SWINERTON INCORPORATED, SP 16 PLUS CORPORATION, AND DOES | TO 25, INCLUSIVE, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 21 COMES NOW, Defendant, SP PLUS CORPORATION, hereby answers 22 Plaintiff's unverified Complaint for itself alone and no other defendant as follows: 23 1 Answering Plaintiff’s Complaint, and each and every cause of action thereof, 24 pursuant to the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 431.30, Subdivision 25 (d), this answering Defendant denies each and every, all and singular, the allegations of said 26 Complaint and further denies that Plaintiff was damaged in the sum or sums alleged, or in any 27 sum, or at all. 28 \W SP PLUS CORPORATION'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT