arrow left
arrow right
  • LUZ ROSALES VS PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC., ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • LUZ ROSALES VS PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC., ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/01/2019 09:03 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk 1 Eric J. Goodman (SBN 210694) GOODMAN MOONEY, LLP 2 3420 Bristol Street, Sixth Floor Costa Mesa, California 92626 3 Telephone: (949) 622-0020 4 Facsimile: (949) 622-0024 Email: litigation@goodmanmooney.com 5 Attorneys for Defendants, PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC. and ABDUL QUBADI 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT (STANLEY MOSK) 10 3420 BRISTOL STREET, SIXTH FLOOR COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 GOODMAN MOONEY, LLP LUZ ROSALES, Case No. 19STCV09350 11 12 Plaintiff, Hon. Dennis J. Landin, Dept. 51 13 v. DEFENDANTS PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC. AND ABDUL 14 PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC., a California QUBADI’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED FIRST AMENDED 15 corporation; ABDUL QUBADI, an individual; and DOES 1 through 25, Inclusive. COMPLAINT 16 Defendants. First Amended Complaint Filed: 3/19/2019 17 18 19 20 Defendants, PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC. and ABDUL QUBADI (“Defendants”) 21 answer the First Amended Complaint ("First Amended Complaint") of Plaintiff, LUZ ROSALES 22 ("Rosales" or "Plaintiff") as follows: 23 GENERAL DENIAL 24 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d), Defendants generally 25 deny each and every allegation of the First Amended Complaint. Defendants further deny that 26 Rosales is entitled to any relief against them, and deny that Rosales has sustained any injury, 27 damage, or loss by reason of any conduct, action, error, or omission on the part of Defendants, or 28 -1- ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT