arrow left
arrow right
  • LUZ ROSALES VS PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC., ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • LUZ ROSALES VS PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC., ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES — CENTRAL DISTRICT LUZ ROSALES, Case No.: 195TCV09350 Plaintiff, VS. (PROPOSED) JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL PRO BOXING SUPPLIES, INC., ET AL, 10 Defendant 11 The action came on regularly for a court trial in Department 51, the Honorable 12 Dennis J. Landin, Judge presiding. Defendant Luz Rosales appeared by attorney Marina Fraigun 13 and the Defendants Abdul Qubadi and Pro Boxing Supplies, Inc. appeared by attorney 14 Christopher L. Rudd. 15 16 Pursuant to the Court’s June 7, 2021, [Proposed] Statement of Decision following 17 court trial, 18 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND ORDERED THAT: 19 Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Luz Rosales and against Abdul Qubadi 20 and Pro Boxing Supplies, [nc. on the following causes of action: second (violation ofwage and 21 hour laws), third (failure to provide meal periods), fourth (failure to provide rest periocs), fifth BB (violation of Labor Cede section 1194 (failure to pay minimum wage), sixth ( failure to pay overtime), seventh (vidlation of Labor Code section 226 (a)), eight (violation of Labor Code BR section 2802), ninth (unfair business practices), tenth (wrongful termination in violation of oR public policy); thirteenth (retaliation in violation of Labor Ccde section 246.5 (c) (1)), fourteenth N No oo (PROPOSED) JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL - 1