On April 17, 2019 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Quintero Maria Barajas,
Quintero Oscar,
and
Kia Motors America Inc.,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 05/23/2022 11:34 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Roger Kirnos (283163) / Amy Morse (290502)
Knight Law Group, LLP
10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2500
Los Angeles, CA 90067
TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 552-2250 FAX NO. (Optional): (310) 552-7973
E-MAIL ADDRESS: amym@knightlaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs, Maria Barajas Quintero and Oscar Quintero
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Maria Barajas Quintero and Oscar Quintero
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Kia Motors America, Inc.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): ✖ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 19STCV13263
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: June 8, 2022 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 58 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name):
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs, Maria Barajas Quintero and Oscar Quintero
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): April 17, 2019
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. ✖ All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in ✖ complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
See attached 4a.
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
May 23, 2022
Case Filing Date
April 17, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.