arrow left
arrow right
  • MICHAEL JUDGE VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MICHAEL JUDGE VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/17/2021 11:37 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Coreas,Deputy Clerk 1 RICKEY IVIE, ESQ. (SBN 76864) Public Entity rivie@imwlaw.com Exempt from Filing Fee 2 ANTONIO K. KIZZIE, ESQ. (SBN 279719) akizzie@imwlaw.com 3 IVIE McNEILL WYATT 4 PURCELL & DIGGS, APLC 444 South Flower Street, Suite 1800 5 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 489-0028 6 Facsimile: (213) 489-0552 7 Attorneys for Defendants, 8 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 12 MICHAEL JUDGE, an individual, ) CASE NO.:19STCV06708 13 ) ) DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO 14 Plaintiffs, ) PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO vs. ) DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION 15 AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON ) THE PLEADINGS AGAINST 16 ) PLAINTIFF’S CAUSE OF ACTION COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public ) FOR NEGLIGENCE; MEMORANDUM 17 entity, DEPUTY EDWIN BARRAGAN, an ) OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES individual; and DOES 1 through 50, ) 18 inclusive, ) 19 ) Date: February 25, 2021 ) 20 Time: 1:30 p.m. Defendants. ) Dept.: 32 ) 21 ) 22 23 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et.al. 24 (hereinafter “DEFENDANTS,” collectively), will and hereby do respectfully reply to Plaintiff’s 25 Michael Judge’s (“Plaintiff”) Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 26 against Plaintiff’s cause of action for negligence. 27 This reply shall be based upon this notice of motion, the motion, the accompanying 28 memorandum of points and authorities, the attached declarations and exhibits, the pleadings and 1 DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AGAINST PLAINTIFF’S CAUSE OF ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE