On February 27, 2019 a
Hearing
was filed
involving a dispute between
Judge Michael,
and
1 Through 50 Inclusive Does,
Barragan Deputy Edwin,
County Of Los Angeles,
Judge Michael,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Spring Street Courthouse, Department 2
19STCV06708 February 9, 2022
MICHAEL JUDGE vs COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. 10:00 AM
Judge: Honorable Mark A. Borenstein CSR: Ryan Wheeler CSR#13717 (appearing
telephonically)
Judicial Assistant: B. Gregg ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff(s): Brian Thomas Dunn, Esq.
For Defendant(s): Antonio K Kizzie, Esq. (appearing telephonically)
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion for Reconsideration (Defendant's motion)
Matter is called for hearing and is heard.
The Court has read all documents filed and reviewed the original Motion For A New Trial.
The Court rules on Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections filed on 1/31/2022 as follows:
All of the objections are overruled except as follows:
Objection #9 -- the objection to the first clause to the word "because", is sustained;
Objection #10 -- the objection to the last sentence is sustained; and
Objection #11 -- this objection is sustained.
The Motion is heard and argued.
The lawyers corrected the Court that the situational Use Of Force chart, Exhibit #302, included
the use of a K-9 force with personal weapons, tasers, impact weapons, carotid restraint, less
lethal weapons, and the TARP procedure in the "assaultive/high risk" category. Firearm use was
included in the "life threatening/serious bodily injury" category but was not with K-9 force. In
this case, there was no evidence any force other than K-9 force was considered.
After consideration of the moving and opposing papers and the argument of counsel, The
Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR NEW TRIAL; filed by County of Los Angeles on 01/14/2022 is Denied. (Defendant Edwin
Barragan joined in on the motion.)
Trial Setting Conference is scheduled for 03/10/2022 at 10:00 AM in Department 2 at Spring
Street Courthouse.
Minute Order Page 1 of 2
Document Filed Date
February 09, 2022
Case Filing Date
February 27, 2019
Status
Jury Verdict 10/25/2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Spring Street Courthouse, Department 2 19STCV06708 February 9, 2022 MICHAEL JUDGE vs COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. 10:00 AM Judge: Honorable Mark A. Borenstein CSR: Ryan Wheeler CSR#13717 (appearing telephonically) Judicial Assistant: B. Gregg ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: None Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Brian Thomas Dunn, Esq. For Defendant(s): Antonio K Kizzie, Esq. (appearing telephonically) NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Motion for Reconsideration (Defendant's motion) Matter is called for hearing and is heard. The Court has read all documents filed and reviewed the original Motion For A New Trial. The Court rules on Plaintiff’s evidentiary objections filed on 1/31/2022 as follows: All of the objections are overruled except as follows: Objection #9 -- the objection to the first clause to the word "because", is sustained; Objection #10 -- the objection to the last sentence is sustained; and Objection #11 -- this objection is sustained. The Motion is heard and argued. The lawyers corrected the Court that the situational Use Of Force chart, Exhibit #302, included the use of a K-9 force with personal weapons, tasers, impact weapons, carotid restraint, less lethal weapons, and the TARP procedure in the "assaultive/high risk" category. Firearm use was included in the "life threatening/serious bodily injury" category but was not with K-9 force. In this case, there was no evidence any force other than K-9 force was considered. After consideration of the moving and opposing papers and the argument of counsel, The Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL; filed by County of Los Angeles on 01/14/2022 is Denied. (Defendant Edwin Barragan joined in on the motion.) Trial Setting Conference is scheduled for 03/10/2022 at 10:00 AM in Department 2 at Spring Street Courthouse. Minute Order Page 1 of 2