arrow left
arrow right
  • MARJORIE DEHEY, ET AL. VS DEFENDANT THE POINT AT BEVERLY HILLS INC., ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARJORIE DEHEY, ET AL. VS DEFENDANT THE POINT AT BEVERLY HILLS INC., ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 11/06/2019 03:12 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Watson, Deputy Clerk 1-110 "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Kere K. Tickner (SBN 174777)/Michelle M. McCliman (SBN 191241) Tickner McCliman, APC 30211 Avenida de las Banderas, Ste. 200, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 TELEPHONE No. (949) 888-6652 FAX NO. (Optionay} E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optiona): mmccliman@ticknermccliman.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant The Point at Beverly Hills, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles sTREET ADpress: 1725 Main Street MAILING ADDRESS: ciTy AND zip CoDE: Santa Monica BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Marjorie Dehey, et al DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: The Point at Beverly Hills, Inc., et al CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one). UNLIMITED CASE (1) Limitep case 19STCV02006 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: November 14, 2019 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: M Div, Room Address of court (if different from the address above). [4] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Kere K. Tickner INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. any or parties (answer one). This statement is submitted by party (name): The Point at Beverly Hills, Inc. b [1] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 1/22/19 b. [) The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date). Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. CI All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b LC) The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [1 have not been served (specify names and explain why not) (2) [1] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names) (3) [1 have had a default entered against them (specify names): ©. CI The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served). Description of case a Type of case in complaint [1 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action). Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal, Rules of Court, ‘Judicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730 (CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov