arrow left
arrow right
  • MARJORIE DEHEY, ET AL. VS DEFENDANT THE POINT AT BEVERLY HILLS INC., ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARJORIE DEHEY, ET AL. VS DEFENDANT THE POINT AT BEVERLY HILLS INC., ET AL Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/29/2019 03:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Kulkin,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY G. David Rubin (SBN 181293) / Hayk Ghalumyan (SBN 314686) LITCHFIELD CAVO LLP 251 South Lake Avenue, Suite 750, Pasadena, CA 91101 TELEPHONE NO.: (626) 683-1100 FAX NO. (Optional): (626) 683-1113 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): rubin@litchfieldcavo.com / ghalunnyan@litchfieldcavo.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendant Quality Control Restoration, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street, MAILING ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street, CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Monica, CA 90401 BRANCH NAME: Santa Monica Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: MARJORIE DEHEY, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: THE POINT AT BEVERLY HILLS INC., et al. • CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): ✓ UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 19STCV02006 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 11/14/2019 Time: 9:00 AM Dept: M Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): ✓ Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): G. David Rubin / Hayk Ghalumyan INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. Party or parties (answer one): a. ✓ This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant Quality Control Restoration, Inc. b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. i All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. 0 The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) Q have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) Q have had a default entered against them (specify names): The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in n complaint 0 cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): After dismissing certain causes of action, Plaintiffs currently allege a sole claim for negligence against Defendant Quality Control Restoration, Inc. Defendant has filed an Answer which denies Plaintiff's allegations. Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California rules 3.720-3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov