arrow left
arrow right
  • SHEERI STEINBERG, ET AL. VS SEAN KNIBB, ET AL. Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • SHEERI STEINBERG, ET AL. VS SEAN KNIBB, ET AL. Other Contract Dispute (not breach/insurance/fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/28/2021 12:10 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by B. McClendon,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Edward E. Johnson (SBN 241065) Ryan W. Light (SBN 293858) THEODORA ORINGHER PC 1840 Century Park East, Suite 500 Los Angeles, CA 90067 TELEPHONE NO.: 310.557.2009 FAX NO. (Optional): 310.551.2083 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ejohnson@tocounsel.com; rlight@tocounsel.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs Sheeri Steinberg and Michael H. Steinberg SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street MAILING ADDRESS: 1725 Main Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Santa Monica, CA 90401 BRANCH NAME: Santa Monica PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Sheeri Steinberg and Michael H. Steinberg DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Sean Knibb, Knibb Design Corp, Hewitt Construction, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): ! UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 19SMCV00681 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: April 29, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: N Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): ! Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Edward E. Johnson INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): Plaintiffs Sheeri Steinberg and Michael H. Steinberg ! 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): April 11, 2019 b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): October 25, 2019 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. ! The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) ! have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): Defendant The Picard Family Company, Inc. d/b/a Watson Plumbing (3) ! have had a default entered against them (specify names): Defendant Gary Alzona d/b/a Sollunar c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in x complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Complaint for fraud; breach of contract; breach of the implied warranty of fitness; breach of the implied warranty of merchantability; negligent construction; breach of fiduciary duty; an accounting; violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act; and trespass Page 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov