arrow left
arrow right
  • JASON WIMBERLY VS WARRIOR FITNESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JASON WIMBERLY VS WARRIOR FITNESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/27/2019 11:44 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk I Keith A. Fink, Bar No. 146841 Sarah E. Hernandez, Bar No. 206305 2 Imbar Sagi-Lebowitz, Bar No. 232728 KEITH A. FINK & ASSOCIATES 3 1990 Bundy Drive, Suite 620 Los Angeles, California 90025 4 Telephone: (310) 268-0780 Facsimile: (310) 268-0790 5 Attorneys for Defendants 6 WARRIOR FITNESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, SIMA FARHOUMAND and SAMIR FARHOUMAND 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 JASON WIMBERLY, Case No. 195TCV16304 [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. RichardJ. 11 Plaintiff, Burdge, Dept. 37j 12 v. DEFENDANTS WARRIOR FITNESS 13 WARRIOR FITNESS ENTERPRISES, LLC; ENTERPRISES, LLC., SIMA a California Limited Liability Company; FARHOUMAN]), AN]) SAMIR 14 SIMA FARHOUMAND, an individual; FARHOUMAND’S REPLY TO PETITION SAMIR FARHOUMAND, an individual; TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 15 DOES 1-10, business entities, forms unknown; DECLARATION OF SARAH E. DOES 11-20, individuals; and DOES 21-30, HERNANDEZ 16 inclusive, [Supplemental Declaration of Samir 17 Defendants. Farhoumand Filed Concurrently Herewith] 18 [Evidentiary Objections Filed Concurrently Herewith] 19 Date: September 4, 2019 20 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 37 21 Reservation ID: 820168329488 22 Complaint filed: May 9, 2019 23 24 TO ALL THE PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 25 Defendants WARRIOR FITNESS ENTERPRISES, LLC., SIMA FARHOUMAND, and 26 SAMIR FARHOUMAND (collectively “Defendants”) hereby submit their Reply in response to 27 Plaintiff JASON WIMBERLY (“Plaintiff” and/or “Mr. Wimberly”) Opposition to Defendants’ 28 Petition to Compel Arbitration. 1 DEFENDANTS’ REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION