arrow left
arrow right
  • CENVEO WORLDWIDE LIMITED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION VS ROBERT SUMMERS Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • CENVEO WORLDWIDE LIMITED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION VS ROBERT SUMMERS Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED Superior Court of California Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles JAN 3.1 2020 Department51 Sherri or cutive Officer/Clerk of Court By. ===; Deputy Jessica Ciavero CENVEO WORLDWIDELIMITED, Case No.: 19STCV22712 Plaintiff, Hearing Date: 01/17/20 Vv ROBERT SUMMERS, et al., Trial Date: Not Set Defendants. RULING RE: Demurrer Background Plaintiff Cenveo Worldwide Limited (“Plaintiff” or “Cenveo”) brings this action against its former employee Robert Summers (“Summers”) alleging that he engaged in wrongful acts involving the company’s confidential trade secrets during and after his employment. On June 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint, and on October 11, 2019, the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Robert Summers, et al. (“Defendants”) for the following causes of action: (1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (2) Intentional Interference with Contractual Relationships; (3) Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage; (4) Conversion; (5) Breach of Contract; (6) Misappropriation of Trade Secrets (Violation of Federal Defense of Trade Secrets Act); (7) Unfair Competition; and (8) Injunctive Relief. On December 16, 2019, Defendants filed the instant Demurrer to the FAC. The Court considered the moving, opposition and reply papers, and rules as follows: Demurrer Standard A demurrer may be sustained where the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10(e). Thus, concerning the legal sufficiency of a pleading, the sole issue on demurrer is whether the facts pleaded, if true, state a valid cause of action, i.e., if the complaint pleads facts that would entitle the plaintiffto relief. Garcettiv. Superior Court (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1533, 1547; Limandri v. Judkins (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 326, 339. The question of plaintiff's ability to prove the allegations of the complaint or the 1