On June 27, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Binder Ed,
Summers Robert,
Cenveo Worldwide Limited A Delaware Corporation,
Cenveo Worldwilde Limited A Delaware Corporation,
and
Lithographix Inc.,
Minguez Ariel,
Summers Robert,
for Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FILED
Superior Court of California
Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles
County of Los Angeles JAN 3.1 2020
Department51
Sherri or cutive Officer/Clerk of Court
By. ===; Deputy
Jessica Ciavero
CENVEO WORLDWIDELIMITED, Case No.: 19STCV22712
Plaintiff,
Hearing Date: 01/17/20
Vv
ROBERT SUMMERS, et al., Trial Date: Not Set
Defendants. RULING RE:
Demurrer
Background
Plaintiff Cenveo Worldwide Limited (“Plaintiff” or “Cenveo”) brings this action against its
former employee Robert Summers (“Summers”) alleging that he engaged in wrongful acts
involving the company’s confidential trade secrets during and after his employment.
On June 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint, and on October 11, 2019, the operative First
Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Robert Summers, et al. (“Defendants”) for the
following causes of action:
(1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty;
(2) Intentional Interference with Contractual Relationships;
(3) Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage;
(4) Conversion;
(5) Breach of Contract;
(6) Misappropriation of Trade Secrets (Violation of Federal Defense of Trade Secrets
Act);
(7) Unfair Competition; and
(8) Injunctive Relief.
On December 16, 2019, Defendants filed the instant Demurrer to the FAC.
The Court considered the moving, opposition and reply papers, and rules as follows:
Demurrer Standard
A demurrer may be sustained where the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a
cause of action. Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10(e). Thus, concerning the legal sufficiency of a
pleading, the sole issue on demurrer is whether the facts pleaded, if true, state a valid cause of
action, i.e., if the complaint pleads facts that would entitle the plaintiffto relief. Garcettiv.
Superior Court (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1533, 1547; Limandri v. Judkins (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th
326, 339. The question of plaintiff's ability to prove the allegations of the complaint or the
1
Document Filed Date
January 31, 2020
Case Filing Date
June 27, 2019
Category
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 10/05/2020
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.