On September 06, 2018 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Galeano Jorge,
Ramirez Rosa,
and
Garcia Maribel Munoz,
for civil
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FIL
oy erior Court of California
‘ounty of Los Angeles
Superior Court of California
JAN ~8 2020
County of Los Angeles Officer/Clerk
Sh err R. ecutive
Deputy
By.
Department 61
JORGE GALEANO, et al., Case No.: BC720843
Plaintiffs, Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2020
Vv. [PBNEPEVE} RULING RE:
MARIBEL MUNOZ GARCIA, et al., PLAINTIFFS JORGE GALEANO AND
ROSA RAMIREZ’S MOTION TO DEEM
Defendants.
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED
AS TO DEFENDANT MARIBEL MUNOZ
GARCIA.
Plaintiffs Jorge Galeano and Rosa Ramirez’s Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions
Admitted as to Defendant Maribel Munoz Garcia is GRANTED. $1,634.65 in sanctions are
awarded against Defendant.
I MOTION TO DEEM ADMITTED
“Any party may obtain discovery . . . by a written request that any other party to the action admit
the genuineness of specified documents, or the truth of specified matters of fact, opinion relating
to fact, or application of law to fact. A request for admission may relate to a matter that is in
controversy between the parties.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.010.) Ifa party fails to serve a timely
response to requests for admissions, “[t]he requesting party may move for an order that the
genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests be deemed
admitted, as well as for a monetary sanction” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280 subd. (b).)
Plaintiffs contend that they served requests for admission upon Defendant on September 11,
2019, and responses were due by agreement on November 4, 2019. (Statman Decl. {| 4-6.) But
no responses were served, and Plaintiffs instead received notice that Defendant would
henceforward be self-represented. (Statman Decl. {| 6.) Despite efforts to contact Defendant
regarding the admissions, she has not responded. (Statman Decl. {| 7.)
The Motion will be GRANTED if code-compliant and objection-free responses to the Requests
for Admission are not provided by the hearing on this motion.
Il. SANCTIONS
Document Filed Date
January 08, 2020
Case Filing Date
September 06, 2018
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 10/25/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
FIL oy erior Court of California ‘ounty of Los Angeles Superior Court of California JAN ~8 2020 County of Los Angeles Officer/Clerk Sh err R. ecutive Deputy By. Department 61 JORGE GALEANO, et al., Case No.: BC720843 Plaintiffs, Date: Tuesday, January 8, 2020 Vv. [PBNEPEVE} RULING RE: MARIBEL MUNOZ GARCIA, et al., PLAINTIFFS JORGE GALEANO AND ROSA RAMIREZ’S MOTION TO DEEM Defendants. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED AS TO DEFENDANT MARIBEL MUNOZ GARCIA. Plaintiffs Jorge Galeano and Rosa Ramirez’s Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted as to Defendant Maribel Munoz Garcia is GRANTED. $1,634.65 in sanctions are awarded against Defendant. I MOTION TO DEEM ADMITTED “Any party may obtain discovery . . . by a written request that any other party to the action admit the genuineness of specified documents, or the truth of specified matters of fact, opinion relating to fact, or application of law to fact. A request for admission may relate to a matter that is in controversy between the parties.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.010.) Ifa party fails to serve a timely response to requests for admissions, “[t]he requesting party may move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted, as well as for a monetary sanction” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280 subd. (b).) Plaintiffs contend that they served requests for admission upon Defendant on September 11, 2019, and responses were due by agreement on November 4, 2019. (Statman Decl. {| 4-6.) But no responses were served, and Plaintiffs instead received notice that Defendant would henceforward be self-represented. (Statman Decl. {| 6.) Despite efforts to contact Defendant regarding the admissions, she has not responded. (Statman Decl. {| 7.) The Motion will be GRANTED if code-compliant and objection-free responses to the Requests for Admission are not provided by the hearing on this motion. Il. SANCTIONS