arrow left
arrow right
  • ROGER MANLIN VS STEVE MILNER Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ROGER MANLIN VS STEVE MILNER Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 04/08/2020 01:18 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Lara,Deputy Clerk 1 HAMBURG, KARIC, EDWARDS & MARTIN LLP GREGG A. MARTIN, ESQ., State Bar No. 135685 2 ANN S. LEE, ESQ., State Bar No. 162810 3 1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1800 Los Angeles, California 90067-4409 4 Telephone: (310) 552-9292 5 Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Complainant, STEVE MILNER and Cross-Complainants, 1220 NADEAU ST., LLC, 1562 6 SEABRIGHT AVENUE, LLC, 157 EAST PANAMA ROAD, LLC, 6363 LINDBERGH, LLC, 120 E. CHURCH AVE., LLC, 7 1615 N. DOWNS, LLC, 921 W. INYOKERN ROAD, LLC, and 103 B Street, LLC 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT 11 ROGER MANLIN, an individual; ) CASE NO.: 19STCV08154 12 ) Plaintiff, ) [Assigned to Hon. Robert B. Broadbelt, Dept. 53] 13 ) v. ) 14 ) DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANTS’ STEVE MILNER; and DOES 1 through 20, ) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/CROSS- 15 inclusive, ) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ) RECONSIDERATION AND REQUEST FOR 16 Defendants. ) MONETARY SANCTIONS OF $5,476.50 _________________________________________ ) AGAINST PLAINTIFF/CROSS-DEFENDANT 17 ) ) ROGER MANLIN; MEMORANDUM OF 18 RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS ) POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; AND ) DECLARATION OF ANN S. LEE, ESQ. 19 ) ) DATE: April 21, 2020 20 ) TIME: 8:30 a.m. ) 21 DEPT: 53 ) 22 23 Defendant/Cross-Complainant, Steve Milner (Milner), and Cross-Complainants, 1220 Nadeau 24 St., LLC, 1562 Seabright Avenue, LLC, 157 East Panama Road, LLC, 6363 Lindbergh, LLC, 120 E. 25 Church Ave., LLC, 1615 N. Downs, LLC, 921 W. Inyokern Road, LLC, and 103 B Street, LLC 26 (collectively, LLCs) hereby submit their Opposition to Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Roger Manlin’s 27 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s December 9, 2019 Order and Request for Monetary Sanctions 28 of $5,476.50 against Plaintiff. DEFENDANT/ CROSS-COMPLAINANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION -i-