arrow left
arrow right
  • ROGER MANLIN VS STEVE MILNER Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ROGER MANLIN VS STEVE MILNER Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/29/2022 01:46 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Lopez,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Siate Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Roger Manlin, Bar # 51094 5042 Wilshire Bivd., No. 567 TELEPHONE NO.: 323-953-6789 FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS: Rmanlin@manliniaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Cross complainant Roger Maniin SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STREET ADDRESS: 111 N. Hill St.. Los Anaeles. CA 90012 MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Roger Mantlin DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Steve Milner, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): [_X_] UNLIMITED CASE [_] LIMITED CASE 19STCV08154 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: September 12, 2022 Time: 8:30 AM Dept.: 53 save file Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [_] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Cross complainant Roger Manlin b. [_] This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (fo be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 12/3/2019 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. [ | All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. [x] The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) [~7] have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) [x7] have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): Hamburg, Karic, Edwards & Martin LLP (3) [| have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. [_] The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case . a. Typeofcasein [_] complaint [x | cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Direct and derivative causes of action for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, elder abuse Page 1 of 5 EF Cc ASE MAN AGEMENT STATEM ENT Cal Roles om cour. Form Adopted for Mandatory Use . . Judicial Council of California www. courts.ca.gov CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021}