arrow left
arrow right
  • ROGER MANLIN VS STEVE MILNER Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • ROGER MANLIN VS STEVE MILNER Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/29/2022 01:50 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Bolden,Deputy Clerk 1 || Roger A. S. Manlin, Bar #51094 502) Wilshire Blvd., No: 567, Los Angeles, CA 90036 2 || Telephone: (323 953-6789 Email: rmanlin@manlinlaw.com 3 4 || Attorney for Plaintiff in Pro Per 5 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT 10 i 12 || Roger Manlin CASE NO.: 19STCV08154 13 Plaintiff, ) (Assigned to Hon. Robert B. Broadbelt, Dept. 53) 14 . ) steve Milner. et a ) PLAINTIFF AND CROSS COMPLAINANT 15 |f reve Nunet, or a". ) ROGER MANLIN’S STATUS CONFERENCE 16 Defendants. ) BRIEF ) 7 |) ———____________________ ) 18 ; ) Date: September 12, 2022 Related Cross-Complaints ) Time: 10 AM 19 ) Dept.: 53 20 >, || BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL STATUS. » This action was commenced by plaintiff Roger Manlin, an attorney acting in pro per, by filing 93 || a complaint on March 8, 2019 against defendant Steve Milner alleging causes of action for breach of o4 || partnership agreements, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, concealment and deceit, breach of the 95 || covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unfair competition, conversion, accounting, and financial 96 || elder abuse. The complaint was based upon Milner’s malfeasance in connection with his management >7 || of a number of real estate LLCs in which plaintiff Manlin has a minority interest ranging from five 5g || percent to 50 percent. No other person has any interest in any of the LLCs. 1 | STATUS CONFERENCE BRIEF