arrow left
arrow right
  • PRECIOUS GRIFFITHS VS VALLEYSTAR, INC., ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • PRECIOUS GRIFFITHS VS VALLEYSTAR, INC., ET AL. Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 03/04/2019 01:05 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by R. Sanchez,Deputy Clerk ATTORNEY QR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Slate Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Steven S. Nimoy, Esq. SBN: 172310 SOLTMAN LEVITT FLAHERTY & WATTLES LLP 90 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Ste. 300 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 TELEPHONE NO.: 805-497-7706 FAX NO. (Opllona/J:805-497-1147 E-MAIL ADDRESS (OplionaQ: ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Valleystar, Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY Of LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS 111 North Hill Street c1TY ANDZIPCODE:Los Angeles, 90012 BRANCH NAME Stanley Mosk Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Precious Griffiths DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Valleystar, Inc., John Mason, et al. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): IT] UNLIMITED CASE D LIMITED CASE 18STCV05559 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date:March 19, 2019 Time:8:30 a.m. Dept.:69 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): DD Notice of Intent to Appear by T elephone, by (nameJ:Steven S. Nimoy, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. IT] This statement is submitted by party (name):Valleystar, Inc. and John Mason b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. D All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in [x] complaint Dcross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): 1. Constructive Discharge; 2. Retaliation; 3. Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; 4. Failure to Provide Meal Periods; 5. Failure to Provide Rest Breaks; 6. Violation of Sick Leave Law; 7. Failure to Provide Accurate Wage Statements; 8. Waiting Time Penalties; 9. Unfair or Unlawful Business Practices; I 0. Penalties Under Private Attorney Generals Act Pa e1 of5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3. 720-3. 730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov Westtaw Doc & Fonn Builder