On March 15, 2022 a Conference was filed involving a dispute between Arntsen Family Partnership, Lp, Arntsen, Robert, Brian Christopher Dunn Custodianship, Ho, John, Huang, Quanyu, Lee, Mary, and Black Horse Holdings, Llc, Bragg, David M, Caproc Iii, Llc, Davis, Gregory J, Huang, Quanyu, Huish, Dale, Justesen, Jason, Kludt, Kurtis Stuart, Mclan Trust, Monks Family Trust, Oneil, Scott, Paramont Capital, Llc, Paramont Woodside, Llc, Silicon Valley Real Ventures, Llc, Stoker, Diane, Stoker, Phil, Svrv 385 Moore, Llc, Svrv 387 Moore, Llc, Teh Capital, Llc, Wild Rose Irrevocable Trust, Wolfe, Kevin, Wz Partners Llc, for (16) Unlimited Fraud in the District Court of San Mateo County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
CIV-140 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY; STATEBAR NO: 254542 FOR COURT USE ONLY NAME: Rvan van Steenis FIRM NAME: STREET ADDRESS: 1601 S Shepherd Dr., #276 ciry: Houston STATE: TX ZIP CODE: 77019 TELEPHONE NO.: 314-749-2284 FAX NO. E-MAIL ADDRESS: rivansteenis@amail.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants Braaa and SVRV SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Mateo STREET ADDRESS: 400 County Center MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND zIP CODE: Redwood City. California 94063 BRANCH NAME: Southern Plaintiff/Petitioner: Arntsen, et al. Defendant/Respondent: Braaa, et al. DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY REGARDING CASE NUMBER: MEET AND CONFER 22-ClV-01148 To the party filing a demurrer, motion to strike, or motion for judgment on the pleadings: This form must be filed with the demurrer, motion to strike, or motion for judgment on the pleadings. 4 (Name of party making declaration): Defendants Bragg & SVRV was served with [J a complaint [2] an amended complaint [E) a cross-complaint [] an answer [J other (specify): in the above-titled action and is filing a [-) demurrer motion to strike [-] motion for judgment on the pleadings DECLARATION (Choose either a. or b.) At least five days before the date a responsive pleading was due to be filed (if | am filing a demurrer or motion to strike) or at least five days before filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings (if | am filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings), | met and conferred with the party who filed the pleading [_] by telephone [__] in person and we did not reach an agreement resolving the matters raised by the demurrer, mot} to strike, or motion for judgment on the pleadings. Enail Coen SPO NOCHE eS b. [__] The party who filed the pleading subject to demurrer, motion to strike, or motion for judgment on the pleadings failed to respond to my request to meet and confer or otherwise failed to meet and confer in good faith. To provide additional information, please use form MC-031, Attached Declaration. | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: March 22, 2023 Ryan van Steenis fo Ge (NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) _enatune OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) Page 4 of 1 Form Approved for Optional Use DECLARATION OF DEMURRING OR MOVING PARTY Code of Civil Procedure, Judicial Council of California §§ 430.41, 435.5, 439, CIV-140 [Rev. January 1, 2019] REGARDING MEET AND CONFER wanw.courts.ca.gov For your protection and privacy, please press the Clear This Form button after you have printed the form. [Print this form | | Save this form | | Clear this form